ArticleBrain & NeuroRehabilitation2024
The Effect of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy on Arm Function and Activities of Daily Living in Post-stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in Brain & NeuroRehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Home-based modified constraint-induced movement therapy improves distal motor outcomes after botulinum toxin A injection in chronic stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Trial
- Effect of slit-regulated 3D embroidered sensor structures on contact area-variation-based strain sensing performance in smart gloves.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Current Status and Associated Factors of Treatment Burden in Stroke Patients: Mixed-Methods Research With a Convergent Parallel Design.Nursing research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) on arm function and daily living compared with conventional rehabilitation in stroke patients with hemiplegia. We searched three international electronic databases-MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library-for relevant studies. The risk of bias was evaluated using Cochrane's Risk of Bias version 1.0, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations method. A total of 34 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included herein. Specifically, 21 RCTs regarding arm motor function, 13 on upper limb motor impairment, and 12 on activities of daily living (ADL) performance were analyzed. The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated that CIMT was significantly more effective than conventional therapy in improving arm motor function, reducing upper limb motor impairment, and enhancing ADL performance. CIMT should be implemented and tailored to the strength of the affected upper limb to improve upper limb function and ADL performance in post-stroke patients with hemiplegia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.