Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39649715›Full record

ArticleBrain & NeuroRehabilitation2024

The Safety and Efficacy of Balance Training on Stroke Patients With Reduced Balance Ability: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Yong Wook Kim, Seo Yeon Yoon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain & NeuroRehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yong Wook KimDepartment and Research Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5234-2454
Seo Yeon YoonDepartment and Research Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0365-2923

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the safety and efficacy of balance training for stroke patients with reduced balance ability by performing a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched up to February 2022. Quality assessment was performed using the using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Studies were included if: 1) patient allocation was randomized; 2) the participant was composed of stroke patients with reduced balance ability (Berg Balance Scale [BBS] ≤ 40, Timed-Up and Go ≥ 14 seconds, or Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test ≤ 17.5); and 3) intervention was additional balance training for the experimental group. Six studies including 466 patients were included in the final analysis. The meta-analysis showed a significant improvement in the BBS (mean difference [MD], 8.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.65, 11.64) and Trunk Impairment Scale (MD, 4.71; 95% CI, 3.45, 5.96) after balance training relative to the comparison group. Ambulation function was significantly improved (standardized MD, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.46, 1.49) after balance training. There was one report of a femur fracture among 230 participants in the balance training group. Balance training in addition to conventional rehabilitation program in stroke patients with reduced balance ability appears to be effective and safe.

Indexed as

Meta-AnalysisPostural BalanceRehabilitationStrokeSystematic Review

Identifiers

PMID39649715
PMCPMC11621668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.