ReviewBrain & NeuroRehabilitation2024
The Optimized Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation With Simulation Using MRI.
Review in Brain & NeuroRehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Individualized transcranial direct current stimulation combined with foot core exercise improves foot and ankle sensorimotor function and static postural control in individuals with chronic ankle instability.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Trial
- Personalized Language Training and Bi-Hemispheric tDCS Improve Language Connectivity in Chronic Aphasia: A fMRI Case Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has emerged as a valuable neuromodulation technique. Many clinical conditions are associated with brain damage, and in severe cases, structural changes such as skull defects are common. These clinical characteristics result in distinct electrical flow patterns during tDCS application compared to cases without brain damage. Recently, notable advancements have been made in both the medical and engineering fields pertaining to the use of in silico modelling and simulation with the aid of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). As a result, it is now possible to conduct simulations tailored to the unique structural anatomy of an individual's brain, using their own MRI data, to provide targeted tDCS. We have developed software that performs both segmentation and simulation, and have conducted randomized controlled trials using optimized tDCS for stroke and disorders of consciousness. Additionally, we have carried out simulation-related research on stroke and burr hole surgery. This review examines various articles related to simulation and optimized tDCS, evaluating their clinical implications. We believe that these insights will provide valuable guidance for both current and future applications of tDCS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.