ArticleShape in medical imaging : International Workshop, ShapeMI 2024, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2024, Marrakesh, Morocco, October 6, 2024, Proceedings. ShapeMI (Workshop) (2024 : Marrakech, Morocco)2025
MASSM: An End-to-End Deep Learning Framework for Multi-Anatomy Statistical Shape Modeling Directly From Images.
Article in Shape in medical imaging : International Workshop, ShapeMI 2024, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2024, Marrakesh, Morocco, October 6, 2024, Proceedings. ShapeMI (Workshop) (2024 : Marrakech, Morocco), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- MASSM: An End-to-End Deep Learning Framework for Multi-Anatomy Statistical Shape Modeling Directly From Images.Shape in medical imaging : International Workshop, ShapeMI 2024, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2024, Marrakesh, Morocco, October 6, 2024, Proceedings. ShapeMI (Workshop) (2024 : Marrakech, Morocco) · 2025Article
- SCorP: Statistics-Informed Dense Correspondence Prediction Directly from Unsegmented Medical Images.Medical Image Understanding and Analysis. Medical Image Understanding and Analysis (Conference) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Statistical Shape Modeling (SSM) effectively analyzes anatomical variations within populations but is limited by the need for manual localization and segmentation, which relies on scarce medical expertise. Recent advances in deep learning have provided a promising approach that automatically generates statistical representations (as point distribution models or PDMs) from unsegmented images. Once trained, these deep learning-based models eliminate the need for manual segmentation for new subjects. Most deep learning methods still require manual prealignment of image volumes and bounding box specification around the target anatomy, leading to a partially manual inference process. Recent approaches facilitate anatomy localization but only estimate population-level statistical representations and cannot directly delineate anatomy in images. Additionally, they are limited to modeling a single anatomy. We introduce MASSM, a novel end-to-end deep learning framework that simultaneously localizes multiple anatomies, estimates population-level statistical representations, and delineates shape representations directly in image space. Our results show that MASSM, which delineates anatomy in image space and handles multiple anatomies through a multitask network, provides superior shape information compared to segmentation networks for medical imaging tasks. Estimating Statistical Shape Models (SSM) is a stronger task than segmentation, as it encodes a more robust statistical prior for the objects to be detected and delineated. MASSM allows for more accurate and comprehensive shape representations, surpassing the capabilities of traditional pixel-wise segmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.