Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39649684›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2024

Enzymatic hydrolysis processing of soybean meal altered its structure and

Dapeng Wang, Honglin Du, Xiuquan Dang, Yufei Zhao, Jiaxuan Zhang, Rujie Liu, Zhenying Ge, Qingzhen Zhong, Zewei Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Cold-Pressing Sunflower Meal and Gastric pH Synergistically ImproveJournal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dapeng WangKey Laboratory of Animal Production, Product Quality and Security, Ministry of Education, Jilin Province Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Honglin DuKey Laboratory of Animal Production, Product Quality and Security, Ministry of Education, Jilin Province Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Xiuquan DangKey Laboratory of Animal Production, Product Quality and Security, Ministry of Education, Jilin Province Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Yufei ZhaoKey Laboratory of Animal Production, Product Quality and Security, Ministry of Education, Jilin Province Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Jiaxuan ZhangKey Laboratory of Animal Production, Product Quality and Security, Ministry of Education, Jilin Province Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Rujie LiuKey Laboratory of Animal Production, Product Quality and Security, Ministry of Education, Jilin Province Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Zhenying GeKey Laboratory of Animal Production, Product Quality and Security, Ministry of Education, Jilin Province Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Qingzhen ZhongKey Laboratory of Animal Production, Product Quality and Security, Ministry of Education, Jilin Province Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Zewei SunKey Laboratory of Animal Production, Product Quality and Security, Ministry of Education, Jilin Province Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The study evaluated the enzymatic hydrolysis processing on physicochemical properties and protein digestive dynamics of soybean meal (SBM), as well as the relationship between protein secondary structure and digestive parameters was established. Methods: Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) were employed to analyze the microstructure and protein structure of the SBM and enzymatic hydrolysis processed soybean meal (ESBM). SBM and ESBM were incubated with pepsin at pH 3.5 and 39°C for 30 min, then with pancreatin at pH 6.8 for 0-240 min. The Results: The results showed that enzymatic hydrolysis processing did not alter the chemical composition of SBM, but changed its microstructure and protein structure. After enzymatic hydrolysis processing, the size of blocky structures of SBM decreased, exhibiting a fibrous surface and a relatively loose internal structure. The β-sheet content of ESBM was lower than that of SBM ( Discussion: Enzymatic hydrolysis processing altered the digestive dynamics of SBM, increased the CP

Indexed as

digestive dynamicsenzymatic hydrolysisproteinsoybean mealstructure

Identifiers

PMID39649684
PMCPMC11621087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.