ArticleTranslational pediatrics2024
Investigation of the catch-up status and termination for corrected age of neurodevelopment in premature infants of different gestational ages.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Corrected age entails determining the age of premature infants by adjusting their gestational age to 40 weeks. Research on corrected age in relation to neurodevelopment is limited, both domestically and internationally, resulting in a lack of consensus and recommendations regarding the appropriate termination of the neurodevelopmental corrected age. This study aimed to assess the neurodevelopmental catch-up status of premature infants with varying gestational ages and to identify appropriate termination criteria for the corrected age of neurodevelopment. Methods: The study included 1,579 premature infants without high-risk factors and 8,441 full-term infants receiving care at the child health clinics of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, and Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Wanzhou District, Chongqing between January 1, 2018, and March 1, 2023. Infants were grouped based on gestational age into early, middle, and late premature infants, as well as full-term infants. Over a 48-month period, the developmental quotient (DQ) of each functional area on the Gesell Developmental Scale was compared across groups. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in DQ of all functional areas between late premature infants and full-term infants at 36 months of age (all P>0.05). In contrast, some developmental functional areas in middle- and early-premature infants and full-term infants exhibited significant differences at 36 months of age; however, by 48 months of age, these differences were no longer significant (all P>0.05). The DQ of all functional areas in the late, middle, and early premature infant groups demonstrated a catch-up trend from 6 to 48 months of chronological age (all P<0.05). Conclusions: The termination age for neurodevelopmental correction in premature infants may continue beyond 36 months of age, with longer correction time required for those born at younger gestational ages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.