Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39649648›Full record

ArticleTranslational pediatrics2024

Constructing a predictive model for early-onset sepsis in neonatal intensive care unit newborns based on SHapley Additive exPlanations explainable machine learning.

Xuefeng Tan, Xiufang Zhang, Jie Chai, Wenjuan Ji, Jinling Ru, Cuilin Yang, Wenjing Zhou, Jing Bai, Yueling Xiong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xuefeng TanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The People's Hospital, Bozhou, China.
Xiufang ZhangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The People's Hospital, Bozhou, China.
Jie ChaiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The People's Hospital, Bozhou, China.
Wenjuan JiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The People's Hospital, Bozhou, China.
Jinling RuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The People's Hospital, Bozhou, China.
Cuilin YangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The People's Hospital, Bozhou, China.
Wenjing ZhouDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The People's Hospital, Bozhou, China.
Jing BaiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The People's Hospital, Bozhou, China.
Yueling XiongTranslational Medicine Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The clinical characteristics of neonatal sepsis (NS) are subtle and non-specific, posing a serious threat to the lives of newborn infants. Early-onset sepsis (EOS) is sepsis that occurs within 72 hours after birth, with a high mortality rate. Identifying key factors of NS and conducting early diagnosis are of great practical significance. Thus, we developed a robust machine learning (ML) model for the early prediction of EOS in neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), investigated the pivotal risk factors associated with EOS development, and provided interpretable insights into the model's predictions. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. This includes 668 newborns (EOS and non-EOS) admitted to the NICU of Bozhou People's Hospital from January to December 2023, excluding 72 newborns born more than three days ago and 166 newborns with medical record data missing more than 30%. Finally, 430 newborns (EOS and non-EOS) were included in the study. Clinical case data were meticulously analyzed, and the dataset was randomly partitioned, allocating 75% for model training and the remaining 25% for test. Data preprocessing was meticulously performed using R language, and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was implemented to select salient features, mitigating the risk of overfitting. Six ML models were leveraged to forecast the incidence of EOS in neonates. The predictive performance of these models was rigorously evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and precision-recall (PR) curve. Furthermore, the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework was employed to provide intuitive explanations for the predictions made by the Categorical Boosting (CatBoost) model, which emerged as the top performer. Results: The ROC area under the curve (ROCAUC) of six ML models, CatBoost, random forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), multilayer perceptron (MLP), support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR) all exceeded 0.900 on the test set. Especially the CatBoost model exhibited superior performance, with favorable outcomes in calibration, decision curve analysis (DCA), and learning curves. Notably, the ROCAUC attained 0.975, and the area under the PR curve (PRAUC) reached 0.947, signifying a high degree of predictive accuracy. Utilizing the SHAP method, seven key features were identified and ranked by their importance: respiratory rate (RR), procalcitonin (PCT), nasal congestion (NC), yellow staining (YS), white blood cell count (WBC), fever, and amniotic fluid turbidity (AFT). Conclusions: By constructing a precision-oriented ML model and harnessing the SHAP method for interpretability, this study effectively identified crucial risk factors for EOS development in neonates. This approach enables early prediction of EOS risk, thereby facilitating timely and targeted clinical interventions for precise diagnosis and treatment.

Indexed as

early-onset sepsis (EOS)machine learning (ML)NewbornsSHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)

Identifiers

PMID39649648
PMCPMC11621883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.