ArticleTranslational pediatrics2024
Optimal lead time for treatment of infantile epileptic spasms syndrome-a secondary data analysis.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS) is a common epileptic syndrome in infancy. Current first-line treatments include adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), corticosteroids and vigabatrin, with early control of epileptic spasms potentially benefiting long-term outcomes, such as improved psychomotor development. Early treatment, which means the prompt use of first-line treatments, is crucial for achieving an initial response in IESS. However, to date, no clear definition of the specific timeframe that constitutes early treatment has been identified. The objective of this study is to perform a secondary analysis of our previously published IESS cohort data to determine a suitable lead time. Methods: An analysis was conducted using a cohort of 263 children with IESS who had previously received ACTH first-line treatment. This study investigated whether intervening within a certain treatment time window could potentially increase or decrease the likelihood of a short-term response. Results: Out of the 263 children with IESS, 108 achieved a short-term response. The lead time of the response group was significantly shorter than that of the non-response group [1.50 (interquartile range, 1.00, 3.00) Conclusions: For children with IESS, initiating first-line treatment within 1.5 months of the onset of spasms is recommended. For those who start first-line treatment after more than 1.5 months from the onset, the likelihood of a short-term response may significantly decrease as the lead time increases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.