Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39649636›Full record

ArticleAnnals of cardiothoracic surgery2024

Heart transplantation from donation after circulatory death: a meta-analysis of national registries.

Vincenzo Tarzia, Matteo Ponzoni, Danila Azzolina, Luca Vedovelli, Nicola Pradegan, Dario Gregori, Gino Gerosa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vincenzo Tarzia *Cardiac Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Matteo Ponzoni *Cardiac Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Danila AzzolinaUnit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Luca VedovelliUnit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Nicola PradeganCardiac Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Dario GregoriUnit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Gino GerosaCardiac Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although it has been widely recognized that heart transplantation (HT) following donation after circulatory death (DCD) can be a successful strategy to expand the donor pool, its clinical outcomes compared to donation after brain death (DBD) are still the subject of intense investigation. We reviewed the clinical characteristics of HT after DCD from the three largest multicenter nationwide registries, highlighting technical aspects, donor and recipient selection, and early outcomes. Moreover, we performed a meta-analysis of survival outcomes of DCD Methods: The PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched in January 2024 to identify the most recent reports from three large multicenter nationwide registries (United States, United Kingdom, and Australia) of HT after DCD. Clinical characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics, and survival curves were reconstructed for DBD using individual patient time-to-event data. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) with confidence interval (CI) was calculated via Cox regression. Results: A total of 646 DCD HT patients and 7,253 DBD controls were included in this review. In the majority of cases, donors were young males. The mean age of recipients ranged from 48 to 57 years, and the majority were males with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Up to 40% of patients required postoperative mechanical circulatory support with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The meta-analysis estimated a pooled 1-year survival of 91.1% (95% CI: 88.6-93.7%) and 90.1% (95% CI: 89.4-90.8%) for DCD and DBD patients, respectively (P=0.91), with a pooled HR of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.65-1.20). Conclusions: Although the generally more favorable clinical profile of DCD donors and recipients may constitute a potential selection bias, our meta-analysis documented similar early and medium-term survival outcomes for DCD and DBD HT.

Indexed as

donation after circulatory death (DCD)Heart transplantation (HT)meta-analysisregistry

Identifiers

PMID39649636
PMCPMC11618126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.