Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39649629›Full record

ArticleAnnals of cardiothoracic surgery2024

Australian outcomes from heart transplantation in the machine perfusion era.

Yashutosh Joshi, Campbell MacLean, Sam Emmanuel, Katherine Wang, Claudio Soto, Jeanette Villanueva, Ling Gao, Aoife Doyle, Sanjay Dutta, Jianxin Wu and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Yashutosh JoshiHeart Transplant Unit, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
Campbell MacLeanFaculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sam EmmanuelHeart Transplant Unit, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
Katherine WangFaculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Claudio SotoDepartment of Perfusion, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
Jeanette VillanuevaVictor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
Ling GaoVictor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
Aoife DoyleVictor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
Sanjay DuttaHeart Transplant Unit, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
Jianxin WuVictor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
Nikunj VaidhyaHeart Transplant Unit, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
Emily GrangerHeart Transplant Unit, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
Alasdair WatsonHeart Transplant Unit, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
Mark ConnellanHeart Transplant Unit, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
Arjun IyerHeart Transplant Unit, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
Paul JanszHeart Transplant Unit, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
Peter MacdonaldHeart Transplant Unit, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In the current era of heart transplantation, machine perfusion strategies are emerging as potential additions to the armamentarium of a transplant unit. Donation after circulatory death (DCD) donor hearts assessed through normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) has helped expand the donor pool. Hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) is emerging as an alternative strategy to traditional static cold storage (SCS) when a prolonged ischemic time is anticipated in brain dead (BD) donors, this is important in Australia where long distant procurement is vital. In this study we examine the outcomes in our unit where both forms of machine perfusion (NMP and HMP), as well as SCS is utilized for donor heart preservation, with a particular focus on severe primary graft dysfunction (sPGD) and mortality. Methods: The year 2021 represents the year when both forms of machine perfusion were available to our unit. Heart transplants in our unit from January 2021 to February 2024 were categorized into three groups for retrospective analysis: (I) DCD-NMP group (n=44); (II) BD-HMP group (n=38), and (III) BD-SCS group (n=78). Results: There were no significant differences in the mean donor and recipient ages between the three groups. Donor preservation time in the BD-HMP group was significantly longer than the donor ischemic time in the BD-SCS group, and organ care system (OCS) run time in the DCD-NMP group (361±89 Conclusions: Machine perfusion strategies represent important additions to the modern transplant unit and can expand the donor pool. Results are encouraging with no differences in 2-year survival or incidence of sPGD across the preservation modalities: DCD-NMP, BD-HMP, and BD-SCS.

Indexed as

donation after circulatory death (DCD)Heart transplantationhypothermic machine perfusion (HMP)normothermic machine perfusion (NMP)organ preservation

Identifiers

PMID39649629
PMCPMC11618123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.