Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39649612›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024

Comprehensive evaluation of AT(N) imaging biomarkers for predicting cognition.

Tom Earnest, Braden Yang, Deydeep Kothapalli, Aristeidis Sotiras, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tom EarnestMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis; 4525 Scott Ave, Saint Louis, MO 63110.ORCID 0000-0001-8671-8424
Braden YangMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis; 4525 Scott Ave, Saint Louis, MO 63110.ORCID 0000-0002-2558-4132
Deydeep KothapalliMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis; 4525 Scott Ave, Saint Louis, MO 63110.
Aristeidis SotirasMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis; 4525 Scott Ave, Saint Louis, MO 63110.ORCID 0000-0003-0795-8820
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
Advanced machine learning algorithms that integrate multi-modal neuroimaging to quantify the heterogeneity in Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG067103 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SOTIRAS, ARISTEIDIS · 2021 to 2025
$2.8M
A High Performance Research Image Repository (RIR) for the Washington University Center of High Performance Computing (CHPC)S10OD030477 · OD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MARCUS, DANIEL SCOTT · 2021 to 2021
$1.9M
Acquisition of a next-generation computing clusterS10OD025200 · OD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TOBIAS, MALCOLM · 2019 to 2019
$597k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG067103NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904NIH HHS S10 OD025200NIH HHS S10 OD030477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Imaging biomarkers enable Methods: We included individuals from ADNI who underwent amyloid-PET ([ Results: Our sample included 490 people (247 female) with a mix of no impairment (n=288), mild impairment (n=163), and dementia (n=39). While almost all biomarkers tested were predictive of cognitive performance, we observed substantial variability in accuracy, even for measures of the same pathology. Tau biomarkers were the single most accurate single predictors, though combination of biomarkers spanning multiple pathologies were more accurate overall. SVM models were generally more accurate than models using traditional biomarkers. Incorporating continuous or non-binary categorical biomarkers was beneficial only for tau and neurodegeneration, but not amyloid. Patterns of results were largely consistent when considering different clinical stages of disease, neuropsychological domains, and longitudinal cognition. In the CSF subsample (n=246), imaging biomarkers strongly outperformed CSF versions for cognitive prediction. Discussion: We demonstrated that different imaging biomarker definitions can lead to variability in downstream predictive tasks. Researchers should consider how their biomarker operationalizations may help or hinder the assessment of disease severity.

Identifiers

PMID39649612
PMCPMC11623732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.