ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024
What does it cost to expand two-way texting for post-operative follow-up? A cost analysis in routine voluntary medical male circumcision settings in South Africa.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Up to 98% of adult voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) clients heal without adverse events (AEs) in South Africa and in the sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) region, yet all clients in South Africa (SA) are still required to attend in-person reviews, creating added work for providers and barriers for clients. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) using our fee-free, open-source, two-way texting (2wT) approach showed that males could independently monitor their healing with support from VMMC nurse-led telehealth and that 2wT was more cost-effective than routine visits for quality post-operative monitoring. The objectives of this costing activity were to assess the additive cost of 2wT vs. SoC during a stepped wedge design (SWD) expansion trial; costing an augmentation of 2wT with dedicated personnel during peak VMMC periods; and estimate the cost savings of 2wT from the payer perspective if scaled in routine VMMC settings. Data was collected from routine financial reports and complemented by previous RCT time-motion estimates. We conducted activity-based costing of SWD and peak season periods; sensitivity analysis estimated 2wT costs at scale. We included data from 6,842 males, with 2,586 (38%) opting for 2wT. 2wT participants attended an average of zero visits; SoC males had an average of 2 visits. Under 2wT, quality care markers improved and AE ascertainment increased while loss to follow-up (LTFU) decreased. Given a VMMC population of 10,000 adults, scenario analysis suggests that: 1) 2wT becomes cost neutral with 45% 2wT enrollment; 2) 2wT saves $0.29/client with 60% 2wT enrollment; and 3) 2wT saves $0.46/client with 80% 2wT enrollment. When implemented at scale, 2wT appears to significantly reduce costs to the healthcare system while improving the quality of post-operative care and requiring no additional client costs. 2wT should be expanded for eligible males across VMMC and other post-operative contexts in South Africa.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.