Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39649599›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024

The Catatonia Quick Screen (CQS): A Rapid Screening Tool for Catatonia in Adult and Pediatric Populations.

James Luccarelli, Mark Kalinich, Jo Ellen Wilson, Jinyuan Liu, D Catherine Fuchs, Andrew Francis, Stephan Heckers, Gregory Fricchione, Joshua Ryan Smith

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

James LuccarelliHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1606-3917
Mark KalinichHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8794-1289
Jo Ellen WilsonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center at Village of Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2565-8012
Jinyuan LiuDepartment of Biostatistics; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
D Catherine FuchsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center at Village of Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1387-4092
Andrew FrancisDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Penn State Medical School, Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1614-1460
Stephan HeckersDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center at Village of Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3601-9910
Gregory FricchioneHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8907-350X
Joshua Ryan SmithDepartment of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7008-165X

Funding

Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Lea K Davis · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
Translational Neuroscience Training for CliniciansT32MH112485 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BUCKNER, RANDY L, ROFFMAN, JOSHUA LAWRENCE · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH112485
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Catatonia is a neuropsychiatric disorder marked by significant disturbances in motor, cognitive, and affective functioning and that is frequently under-diagnosed. To enhance clinical detection of catatonia, this study aimed to develop a rapid, sensitive Catatonia Quick Screen (CQS) using a reduced set of catatonic signs to facilitate screening in adult and pediatric patients. Methods: Data were derived from two retrospective cohorts totaling 446 patients (254 adults, 192 children) who screened positive for catatonia using the Bush Francis Catatonia Screening Instrument (BFCSI). Sensitivity analyses were performed for all combinations of BFCSI signs, with sensitivity defined as the proportion of patients identified by each subset relative to the full BFCSI. The CQS was developed by selecting signs from the BFCSI based on sensitivity, ease of assessment, and relevance to diverse catatonia presentations. Results: Screening for the presence of any one of four signs-excitement, mutism, staring, or posturing-using the CQS yielded a theoretical sensitivity of 97% (95% CI: 95 to 98%) relative to the full BFCSI (which requires two signs out of 14). The CQS demonstrated 97% sensitivity across both pediatric and adult subsets. Conclusion: The Catatonia Quick Screen provides a rapid screening alternative to the BFCSI with high sensitivity, potentially improving early detection of catatonia in clinical settings. Future prospective studies are necessary to validate the CQS's sensitivity and to determine its specificity in clinical populations.

Indexed as

catatoniadiagnosispsychiatric status rating scalesretrospective studiesscreening

Identifiers

PMID39649599
PMCPMC11623750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.