ArticleJournal of sports science & medicine2024
Prediction of Perceived Exertion Ratings in National Level Soccer Players Using Wearable Sensor Data and Machine Learning Techniques.
Article in Journal of sports science & medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to identify relationships between external and internal load parameters with subjective ratings of perceived exertion (RPE). Consecutively, these relationships shall be used to evaluate different machine learning models and design a deep learning architecture to predict RPE in highly trained/national level soccer players. From a dataset comprising 5402 training sessions and 732 match observations, we gathered data on 174 distinct parameters, encompassing heart rate, GPS, accelerometer data and RPE (Borg's 0-10 scale) of 26 professional male professional soccer players. Nine machine learning algorithms and one deep learning architecture was employed. Rigorous preprocessing protocols were employed to ensure dataset equilibrium and minimize bias. The efficacy and generalizability of these models were evaluated through a systematic 5-fold cross-validation approach. The deep learning model exhibited highest predictive power for RPE (Mean Absolute Error: 1.08 ± 0.07). Tree-based machine learning models demonstrated high-quality predictions (Mean Absolute Error: 1.15 ± 0.03) and a higher robustness against outliers. The strongest contribution to reducing the uncertainty of RPE with the tree-based machine learning models was maximal heart rate (determining 1.81% of RPE), followed by maximal acceleration (determining 1.48%) and total distance covered in speed zone 10-13 km/h (determining 1.44%). A multitude of external and internal parameters rather than a single variable are relevant for RPE prediction in highly trained/national level soccer players, with maximum heart rate having the strongest influence on RPE. The ExtraTree Machine Learning model exhibits the lowest error rates for RPE predictions, demonstrates applicability to players not specifically considered in this investigation, and can be run on nearly any modern computer platform.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.