ArticleBioinformatics and biology insights2024
Comprehensive Analysis of the Influence of Technical and Biological Variations on De Novo Assembly of RNA-Seq Datasets.
Article in Bioinformatics and biology insights, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
De novo assembly of transcriptomes from species without reference genome remains a common problem in functional genomics. While methods and algorithms for transcriptome assembly are continually being developed and published, the quality of de novo assemblies using short reads depends on the complexity of the transcriptome and is limited by several types of errors. One problem to overcome is the research gap regarding the best method to use in each study to obtain high-quality de novo assembly. Currently, there are no established protocols for solving the assembly problem considering the transcriptome complexity. In addition, the accuracy of quality metrics used to evaluate assemblies remains unclear. In this study, we investigate and discuss how different variables accounting for the complexity of RNA-Seq data influence assembly results independently of the software used. For this purpose, we simulated transcriptomic short-read sequence datasets from high-quality full-length predicted transcript models with varying degrees of complexity. Subsequently, we conducted de novo assemblies using different assembly programs, and compared and classified the results using both reference-dependent and independent metrics. These metrics were assessed both individually and combined through multivariate analysis. The degree of alternative splicing and the fragment size of the paired-end reads were identified as the variables with the greatest influence on the assembly results. Moreover, read length and fragment size had different influences on the reconstruction of longer and shorter transcripts. These results underscore the importance of understanding the composition of the transcriptome under study, and making experimental design decisions related to the need to work with reads and fragments of different sizes. In addition, the choice of assembly software will positively impact the final assembly outcome. This selection will affect the completeness of represented genes and assembled isoforms, as well as contribute to error reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.