Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39649467›Full record

ArticleAffective science2024

Overthinking over Screens: Girls Ruminate More After Negative Social Media Interactions with Peers Compared to In-Person Interactions.

Zelal Kilic, Kirsten M P McKone, Claire D Stout, Melanie J Grad-Freilich, Cecile D Ladouceur, Sophia Choukas-Bradley, Jennifer S Silk

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Affective science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zelal KilicDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, 4423 Sennott Square, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA.ORCID 0009-0003-1872-5405
Kirsten M P McKoneDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, 4423 Sennott Square, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA.
Claire D StoutDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, 4423 Sennott Square, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA.
Melanie J Grad-FreilichDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, 4423 Sennott Square, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA.
Cecile D LadouceurDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA.
Sophia Choukas-BradleyDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, 4423 Sennott Square, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA.
Jennifer S SilkDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, 4423 Sennott Square, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA.

Funding

Real-Time Assessment of Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors in High-Risk Early Adolescent GirlsR01MH103241 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI LADOUCEUR, CECILE D., SILK, JENNIFER S · 2015 to 2019
$3.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH103241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rise and ubiquity of social media (SM), the context for peer interactions has changed drastically for adolescents, yet, little is known about how digital peer interactions compare to in-person interactions in their impact on adolescents' emotional experiences. Adolescents employ various emotion regulation (ER) strategies to navigate the complexities of peer interactions, with varying strategy adaptiveness and efficacy. This study delves into the prevalence of ER strategies following daily negative peer interactions on SM, exploring to what extent context (SM or in-person) influences the selection of ER strategies. Over 16 days, 106 U.S. adolescent girls, aged 11-13 (half at high risk for developing an affective disorder), participated in ecological momentary assessments, detailing their worst recent peer interactions, the context (SM or in-person), and the subsequent ER strategies employed. Multilevel models revealed that teens were more prone to rumination after negative peer interactions on SM than in-person (OR = 2.08,

Indexed as

AdolescenceEmotion regulationPeer relationshipsRuminationSocial media

Identifiers

PMID39649467
PMCPMC11624163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.