Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39649455›Full record

ArticleAffective science2024

Let's Talk About It in the Morning: How Circadian Rhythms Impact Information Sharing on Social Media.

Rob Gleasure, Maylis Saigot, Irfan Kanat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Affective science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rob GleasureDepartment of Digitalization, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Maylis SaigotUQ Business School, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7735-2480
Irfan KanatBetter Energy, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the role of circadian rhythms in online information sharing. We gathered 416,914 posts from the social media platform X (formerly Twitter). We identified daily patterns of collective positive and negative affect in these posts, consistent with previous research on social media and circadian rhythms. We created predicted values of positive and negative affect for each post, based on the time a post was created. We then used these predicted values for each post to estimate that post's likelihood of being reshared. We controlled for a range of possible confounders, such as the actual positive and negative affect expressed in a specific post and the number of existing followers and previous posts of the user who created the post, as well as whether the post contained hashtags, mentions, and quotes. The results support a strong relationship between the predicted positive and negative affect of a post-based on circadian patterns of collective positive and negative affect-and the likelihood of a post being shared. We further examine seasonal changes and design a natural experiment, in which we compare patterns of positive and negative affect and information sharing before and after the clocks change, i.e., "spring forward" and "fall back." The results suggest that these daily collective patterns of positive and negative affect on social media are influenced, at least partly, by hormonal influences and not only collective daily routines.

Indexed as

Circadian rhythmsEmotionInformation sharingSocial mediaTwitter

Identifiers

PMID39649455
PMCPMC11624179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.