ArticleInterface focus2024
Robust data-driven segmentation of pulsatile cerebral vessels using functional magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in Interface focus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- TRACC-PHYSIO: Time-Domain Resolution-Aligned Cross-Correlation to Estimate PHYSIOlogical Coupling and Time Delays in Dynamic MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Ultrafast fMRI Detects Age-Related Changes in Harmonics of Cardiac Pulsations in the Brain at 7 T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- HyPER: Region-specific hypersampling of fMRI to resolve low-frequency, respiratory, and cardiac pulsations, revealing age-related differences.NeuroImage · 2025Article
- Ultrafast fMRI detects age-related changes in harmonics of cardiac pulsations in the brain at 7 T.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The pulsing brain: state of the art and an interdisciplinary perspective.Interface focus · 2025Review
- An fMRI approach to assess intracranial arterial-to-venous cardiac pulse delay in aging.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- The pulsing brain: part I.Interface focus · 2024Article
- Robust data-driven segmentation of pulsatile cerebral vessels using functional magnetic resonance imaging.Interface focus · 2024Article
- Coupled pulsatile vascular and paravascular fluid dynamics in the human brain.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) captures rich physiological and neuronal information, offering insight into neurofluid dynamics, vascular health and waste clearance. Accurate cerebral vessel segmentation could greatly facilitate fluid dynamics research in fMRI. However, existing vessel identification methods, such as magnetic resonance angiography or deep-learning-based segmentation on structural MRI, cannot reliably locate cerebral vessels in fMRI space due to misregistration from inherent fMRI distortions. To address this challenge, we developed a data-driven, automatic segmentation of cerebral vessels directly within fMRI space. This approach identified large cerebral arteries and the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) by leveraging these vessels' distinct pulsatile signal patterns during the cardiac cycle. The method was validated in a local dataset by comparing it to ground truth cerebral artery and SSS segmentations. Using the Human Connectome Project (HCP) ageing dataset, the method's reproducibility was tested on 422 participants aged 36-90, each with four repeated fMRI scans. The method demonstrated high reproducibility, with an intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.7 in both cerebral artery and SSS segmentation volumes. This study demonstrates that large cerebral arteries and SSS can be reproducibly and automatically segmented in fMRI datasets, facilitating reliable fluid dynamics investigation in these regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.