ArticleInfection and drug resistance2024
Evaluating Risk Factors for Clinical Failure Among Tigecycline-Treated Patients.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Outcomes of Pandrug-Resistant Versus Carbapenem-Resistant, Colistin-SusceptibleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Beyond β-Lactams: Defining the Role of Eravacycline in Multidrug-Resistant and Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Infections.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Emergence of Carbapenem-ResistantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Clinical trials have documented that tigecycline has a higher mortality risk than other treatments; it continues to be widely used for various infections in real-world settings, where its associated risk factors for clinical failure are understudied. Patients and Methods: This retrospective analysis included a prospective 2019-2021 cohort of tigecycline-treated patients, excluding those with multiple infection sites. We assessed the outcomes on day 28, with clinical failure defined by mortality, persistent initial infection symptoms, or the requirement for continued antimicrobial treatment. Multivariable logistic regression was used for the outcome analysis. Results: Of 253 patients included in the study, 94 experienced clinical failure. The infection foci included pneumonia (46.3%), bloodstream infection (BSI) (25.3%), and skin/soft tissue infections (10.3%). There were no significant differences in high-dose tigecycline administration or monotherapy rates between patients with favorable outcomes and those with clinical failure. A higher Charlson comorbidity index (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.20, Conclusion: Multiple comorbidities, BSI, and higher Pitt bacteremia scores are associated with increased risk of clinical failure in tigecycline-treated patients. These results suggest clinicians should consider alternatives to tigecycline for patients with these risk factors. When administering tigecycline, vigilant monitoring is indicated to manage potential clinical failures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.