Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39649431›Full record

ArticleInfection and drug resistance2024

Evaluating Risk Factors for Clinical Failure Among Tigecycline-Treated Patients.

Chun-Fu Huang, Jia-Ling Yang, Yu-Chung Chuang, Wang-Huei Sheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Emergence of Carbapenem-ResistantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chun-Fu HuangDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Yun-Lin Branch, Yun-Lin, Taiwan.
Jia-Ling YangDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yu-Chung Chuang *Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-3094-8276
Wang-Huei Sheng *Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Clinical trials have documented that tigecycline has a higher mortality risk than other treatments; it continues to be widely used for various infections in real-world settings, where its associated risk factors for clinical failure are understudied. Patients and Methods: This retrospective analysis included a prospective 2019-2021 cohort of tigecycline-treated patients, excluding those with multiple infection sites. We assessed the outcomes on day 28, with clinical failure defined by mortality, persistent initial infection symptoms, or the requirement for continued antimicrobial treatment. Multivariable logistic regression was used for the outcome analysis. Results: Of 253 patients included in the study, 94 experienced clinical failure. The infection foci included pneumonia (46.3%), bloodstream infection (BSI) (25.3%), and skin/soft tissue infections (10.3%). There were no significant differences in high-dose tigecycline administration or monotherapy rates between patients with favorable outcomes and those with clinical failure. A higher Charlson comorbidity index (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.20, Conclusion: Multiple comorbidities, BSI, and higher Pitt bacteremia scores are associated with increased risk of clinical failure in tigecycline-treated patients. These results suggest clinicians should consider alternatives to tigecycline for patients with these risk factors. When administering tigecycline, vigilant monitoring is indicated to manage potential clinical failures.

Indexed as

clinical responsepredictorstigecycline

Identifiers

PMID39649431
PMCPMC11625427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.