Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39649371›Full record

ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2024

Perceived Barriers and Facilitators of Behavioral-Health Modality Change Adoption During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review.

Nicholas Sims-Rhodes, Hannah E Cornwell, Emily Barena, Vandy Dubre, Kimberly S Elliott, Eman H Nabulsi, Nelly Yuen, Sarah M Sass, Anastasia Miller, Yordanos M Tiruneh and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nicholas Sims-RhodesDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Texas at Tyler Health Science Center, Tyler, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8345-6203
Hannah E CornwellDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Texas at Tyler Health Science Center, Tyler, TX, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-1780-1636
Emily BarenaDepartment of Psychology and Counseling, The University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX, USA.
Vandy DubreRobert R. Muntz Library, The University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-4036-0107
Kimberly S ElliottDepartment of Healthcare Policy, Economics and Management, University of Texas at Tyler Health Science Center, Tyler, TX, USA.
Eman H NabulsiDepartment of Psychiatry, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Nelly YuenDepartment of Psychology and Counseling, The University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX, USA.
Sarah M SassDepartment of Psychology and Counseling, The University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX, USA.
Anastasia MillerDepartment of Educational Leadership, Evaluation and Organizational Development, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5928-4026
Yordanos M TirunehDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Texas at Tyler Health Science Center, Tyler, TX, USA.
Karan P SinghDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Texas at Tyler Health Science Center, Tyler, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1841-846X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic, there was a surge in demand for mental health services worldwide, presenting challenges for healthcare institutions as they navigated changes in policy and safety regulations. In the United States, this resulted in many behavioral health modality changes to remain in compliance with the Center for Disease Control guidelines. A growing body of literature has documented these, yet few explored barriers and facilitators affecting the adoption of these modality delivery changes. The researchers conducted a systematic review using the PRISMA method, focusing on service delivery changes across healthcare systems in the United States from March 2020 to May 2022. Objective: The study objective was to identify barriers and facilitators affecting the adoption of changes to modality delivery of behavioral health services due to pandemic restrictions. Methods: This was a systematic review that utilized the PRISMA method. The researchers identified 445 initial articles from eight databases using predetermined keywords and implemented a three-round screening process to select the most pertinent articles for this review. The researchers used a thematic analysis focused on user-related, program-related, technology, and environment-related constructs relevant to engagement with digital mental health interventions, and also addressed provider and administrative-related barriers and facilitators of virtual behavioral health modality changes. Barriers and facilitators were operationalized using the Borghouts Model. Results: This systematic review revealed several common barriers and facilitators, including underdeveloped technology infrastructure, privacy and confidentiality concerns, poor technology literacy, availability of diverse technology options, provider technology training, and ease of integration into everyday life. Conclusion: This review provides insights into barriers and facilitators of modality change adoption, which could inform the development and implementation of virtual mental healthcare services and may help optimize the application of these services by improving our understanding and ability to overcome barriers influencing their adoption.

Indexed as

alternative modalitiesBorghout model barriers and facilitators to technology adoptioncare delivery challengesCOVID-19digital mental healthPRISMA methodtechnology adoptiontelehealthtelemental health

Identifiers

PMID39649371
PMCPMC11624676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.