Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39649342›Full record

ArticleNpj imaging2024

Robust self-supervised denoising of voltage imaging data using CellMincer.

Brice Wang, Tianle Ma, Theresa Chen, Trinh Nguyen, Ethan Crouse, Stephen J Fleming, Alison S Walker, Vera Valakh, Ralda Nehme, Evan W Miller and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Npj imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Brice WangData Sciences Platform (DSP), Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA USA.
Tianle MaData Sciences Platform (DSP), Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA USA.
Theresa ChenSpatial Technology Platform (STP), Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA USA.
Trinh NguyenSpatial Technology Platform (STP), Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA USA.
Ethan CrouseStanley Center for Psychiatric Research at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA USA.
Stephen J FlemingData Sciences Platform (DSP), Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA USA.
Alison S WalkerDepartments of Molecular & Cell Biology and Chemistry and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA USA.
Vera ValakhSpatial Technology Platform (STP), Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA USA.
Ralda NehmeStanley Center for Psychiatric Research at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA USA.
Evan W MillerDepartments of Molecular & Cell Biology and Chemistry and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA USA.
Samouil L FarhiSpatial Technology Platform (STP), Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA USA.
Mehrtash BabadiData Sciences Platform (DSP), Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA USA.

Funding

Genetic neuroscience: How human genes and alleles shape neuronal phenotypesU01MH115727 · NIMH · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI ARLOTTA, PAOLA, BABADI, MEHRTASH · 2017 to 2021
$20.8M
Interrogating Neuronal Membrane Potential Dynamics with Optical Voltage SensorsR01NS098088 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI Evan Walker Miller · 2017 to 2026
$4.4M
Unraveling the Genetic Programs Engaged in ASD Neurons Through Coupled Transcriptomic and Phenotypic ReadoutsR01MH128366 · NIMH · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI Samouil Farhi, Ralda Nehme · 2022 to 2026
$3.7M
Pooled Optical Screens of Synaptic FunctionR21MH120423 · NIMH · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI FARHI, SAMOUIL, PAN, JEN QIAN · 2020 to 2021
$470k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH128366NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH120423NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH115727NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS098088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Voltage imaging is a powerful technique for studying neuronal activity, but its effectiveness is often constrained by low signal-to-noise ratios (SNR). Traditional denoising methods, such as matrix factorization, impose rigid assumptions about noise and signal structures, while existing deep learning approaches fail to fully capture the rapid dynamics and complex dependencies inherent in voltage imaging data. Here, we introduce CellMincer, a novel self-supervised deep learning method specifically developed for denoising voltage imaging datasets. CellMincer operates by masking and predicting sparse pixel sets across short temporal windows and conditions the denoiser on precomputed spatiotemporal auto-correlations to effectively model long-range dependencies without large temporal contexts. We developed and utilized a physics-based simulation framework to generate realistic synthetic datasets, enabling rigorous hyperparameter optimization and ablation studies. This approach highlighted the critical role of conditioning on spatiotemporal auto-correlations, resulting in an additional 3-fold SNR gain. Comprehensive benchmarking on both simulated and real datasets, including those validated with patch-clamp electrophysiology (EP), demonstrates CellMincer's state-of-the-art performance, with substantial noise reduction across the frequency spectrum, enhanced subthreshold event detection, and high-fidelity recovery of EP signals. CellMincer consistently outperforms existing methods in SNR gain (0.5-2.9 dB) and reduces SNR variability by 17-55%. Incorporating CellMincer into standard workflows significantly improves neuronal segmentation, peak detection, and functional phenotype identification, consistently surpassing current methods in both SNR gain and consistency.

Indexed as

Cellular imagingFluorescence imagingImage processing

Identifiers

PMID39649342
PMCPMC11618097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.