ArticleNpj imaging2024
Robust self-supervised denoising of voltage imaging data using CellMincer.
Article in Npj imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrafast optical imaging techniques for exploring rapid neuronal dynamics.Neurophotonics · 2025Review
- High-speed in vivo calcium recording using structured illumination with self-supervised denoising.Optics continuum · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Voltage imaging is a powerful technique for studying neuronal activity, but its effectiveness is often constrained by low signal-to-noise ratios (SNR). Traditional denoising methods, such as matrix factorization, impose rigid assumptions about noise and signal structures, while existing deep learning approaches fail to fully capture the rapid dynamics and complex dependencies inherent in voltage imaging data. Here, we introduce CellMincer, a novel self-supervised deep learning method specifically developed for denoising voltage imaging datasets. CellMincer operates by masking and predicting sparse pixel sets across short temporal windows and conditions the denoiser on precomputed spatiotemporal auto-correlations to effectively model long-range dependencies without large temporal contexts. We developed and utilized a physics-based simulation framework to generate realistic synthetic datasets, enabling rigorous hyperparameter optimization and ablation studies. This approach highlighted the critical role of conditioning on spatiotemporal auto-correlations, resulting in an additional 3-fold SNR gain. Comprehensive benchmarking on both simulated and real datasets, including those validated with patch-clamp electrophysiology (EP), demonstrates CellMincer's state-of-the-art performance, with substantial noise reduction across the frequency spectrum, enhanced subthreshold event detection, and high-fidelity recovery of EP signals. CellMincer consistently outperforms existing methods in SNR gain (0.5-2.9 dB) and reduces SNR variability by 17-55%. Incorporating CellMincer into standard workflows significantly improves neuronal segmentation, peak detection, and functional phenotype identification, consistently surpassing current methods in both SNR gain and consistency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.