ArticleSurgery open science2024
See one, teach yourself one, do one: Barriers and opportunities in self-administered training and assessment for global surgical education.
Article in Surgery open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Practicing for life: landscape and priorities for simulation-based education in global children's surgery.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
- Enhancing surgical capacity in the low- to middle-income countries An initial report of a Global Surgery Partnership Initiative in pediatric and reconstructive urology using a mixed-method approach.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026Article
- The role of remote and virtual surgical training in expanding cardiothoracic surgical capacity in low-resource regions.BMC surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We aimed to determine the most important perceived barriers to the implementation of self-administered training and assessment in surgical education according to subject matter experts. With these findings, design thinking was used to explore possible interventions and develop a theory of change for overcoming identified barriers. Specifically, implementation was focused on expanding the surgical skills of associate clinicians (ACs) in low-to-middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods: A qualitative study with 10 field experts representing surgeons, educators, and engineers from the US, South America, and East and West Africa was conducted. Interviewees were selected through purposeful snowball sampling until thematic saturation. Semi-structured interviews were conducted over video conference or in-person. Open-ended responses were synthesized, coded, and used to identify key barriers for scaling simulation-based learning and self-administered training and assessment in low-resource settings. Results: We identified four major barriers to widespread implementation of self-administered training and assessment: demonstration of the safety and quality of surgical care provided after self-administered training; validation of the principle of self-administered training and assessment; translation of simulation skills to surgical knowledge; and integration into existing task shifting and task sharing legal landscapes. Discussion: Increasing surgical capacity in LMICs is an urgent need that could be expanded with carefully developed self-administered training and assessment for ACs. The implementation process will be variable depending on local culture and regulations but is dependent on an international community of local champions to first produce a common body of evidence supporting the technology's utility and then to generate local excitement for its integration into existing systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.