ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2024
Meta-analysis of electrical stimulation promoting recovery of gastrointestinal function after gynecological abdominal surgery.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasound-activated trilayer piezoelectric bio-adhesive for rapid repair and antibacterial treatment of gastrointestinal perforation.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Impact of laser acupuncture on gastrointestinal function recovery in patients after acute appendicitis surgery: A retrospective clinical study.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe effects of electrical stimulation on gastrointestinal function recovery after gynecological abdominal surgery was not clear.
aimTo systematically evaluate the effects of electrical stimulation on gastrointestinal function recovery after gynecological abdominal surgery.
methodsThe Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, ProQuest, and the Chinese biomedical literature databases Wanfang, Weipu, and CNKI were used to search for relevant studies on controlled trials of electrical stimulation in gynecological abdominal surgery patients from self-established databases to May 2024. The RevMan software (version 5.3) was used to analyze the included literature and explore the heterogeneity of each study.
resultsSeven controlled trials, involving 520 patients, were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that electrical stimulation could shorten the recovery time of intestinal sound after gynecological abdominal surgery [odds ratio (OR): -5.11, 95%CI: -5.84 to -4.38,
conclusionElectrical stimulation can shorten this reduces the length of time it takes for the patient to recover from bowel sounds and also affects the time to first anal voiding and defecation to some extent, thereby promoting gastrointestinal function recovery after gynecological abdominal surgery. The quality of the studies included in this review was poor, which may have affected the final results. It is necessary to conduct a randomized controlled study with higher quality and more samples to further confirm the promoting effect of electrical stimulation on gastrointestinal function recovery to guide clinical treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.