Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39649209›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2024

Effect of comprehensive management combined with cognitive intervention on patient cooperation and complications during digestive endoscopy.

Jin-Dan Yuan, Zhi-Zhi Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jin-Dan YuanDigestive Endoscopy Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, Jiangsu Province, China.
Zhi-Zhi ZhangDigestive Endoscopy Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, Jiangsu Province, China. zhizhizhang_z@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs lifestyles continue to change worldwide, the incidence of digestive tract carcinoma has gradually increased. Digestive endoscopy is an important tool that can assist in the diagnosis, treatment, and surgical intervention for this disease. However, the examination process is affected by many factors, and patient cooperation is often poor, which can increase the risk of complications.

aimTo explore the effects of integrated management and cognitive intervention on cooperation and complications in patients undergoing endoscopy for early gastrointestinal neoplasms.

methodsA total of 354 patients with early stage gastrointestinal cancer who underwent digestive endoscopy procedures between January and December 2023 at our hospital were divided into observation and control groups (177 patients in each group) in a randomized controlled blind trial. The control group received routine interventions, while the observation group received comprehensive integrated management combined with cognitive interventions. We compared the changes in adverse mood, discomfort, examination time, cooperation with the examination, and complications before and after the intervention between the two groups.

resultsThe self-rated anxiety and depression scale scores were lower in the observation group than in the control group (

conclusionIntegrated management and cognitive intervention in early gastrointestinal neoplasm endoscopy alleviate mood, reduce discomfort, shorten examinations, improve cooperation, and reduce complications.

Indexed as

Cognitive interventionComplicationsComprehensive integrated managementCooperationDigestive endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID39649209
PMCPMC11622071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.