ArticlePhotoacoustics2024
Quantitative evaluation of microenvironmental changes and efficacy of cupping therapy under different pressures based on photoacoustic imaging.
Article in Photoacoustics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Trends and hotspots in cupping therapy research for pain: a bibliometric study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Fully integrated photoacoustic microscopy for multi-scale and longitudinal imaging in translational biomedical applications.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Blood-letting cupping therapy for incision infection after laparoscopic surgery: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A clinical feasibility study of a photoacoustic finder for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients: A prospective cross-sectional study.Photoacoustics · 2025Article
- Vitamin B12 injection plus traditional Chinese medicine techniques for meralgia paresthetica: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cupping therapy, a traditional Chinese medicinal practice, has been subjected to scientific scrutiny to validate its effects on local tissue microenvironments. This study provides a quantitative assessment of cupping therapy at different negative pressures using photoacoustic imaging. Low-pressure cupping (-20 kPa) significantly improved local blood circulation, evidenced by increased hemoglobin oxygen saturation and vessel dilation that normalized within two hours. In contrast, high-pressure cupping (-30 kPa) led to capillary rupture, bleeding, and tissue edema, similar to the clinical presentation of cupping bruises. Additionally, our research unveiled that -20 kPa cupping expedited the clearance of indocyanine green dye, suggesting enhanced lymphatic drainage, which was further supported by fluorescence imaging. This indicates a potential mechanism for cupping's pain relief effects. Moreover, cupping showed promising results in improving sepsis outcomes in mice, potentially due to its anti-inflammatory properties. This study establishes a foundation for the objective evaluation of cupping therapy, demonstrating that low-pressure cupping is effective in promoting blood and lymphatic flow while minimizing tissue damage, thereby offering a safer therapeutic approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.