Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39649134›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024

Severe mental illness and infectious disease mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Amy Ronaldson, Isabelle Nascimento Santana, Sophie Carlisle, Katie H Atmore, Natasha Chilman, Margaret Heslin, Sarah Markham, Alex Dregan, Jayati Das-Munshi, Temi Lampejo and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Amy RonaldsonHealth Service & Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, UK.
Isabelle Nascimento SantanaEast London NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Sophie CarlisleHealth Service & Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, UK.
Katie H AtmoreHealth Service & Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, UK.
Natasha ChilmanDepartment of Psychological Medicine, IoPPN, King's College London, UK.
Margaret HeslinHealth Service & Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, UK.
Sarah MarkhamDepartment of Biostatistics & Health Informatics, IoPPN, King's College London, UK.
Alex DreganDepartment of Psychological Medicine, IoPPN, King's College London, UK.
Jayati Das-MunshiDepartment of Psychological Medicine, IoPPN, King's College London, UK.
Temi LampejoInfection Sciences, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Matthew HotopfDepartment of Psychological Medicine, IoPPN, King's College London, UK.
Ioannis BakolisHealth Service & Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Evidence from meta-analyses suggest that people with severe mental illness (SMI) are at increased risk of death from infectious diseases compared to those without SMI. However, few reviews have focused on mortality risk from specific infection types, apart from COVID-19. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to comprehensively describe and quantify the risk of death from infections (excluding COVID-19) in people with SMI, exploring specific infection types where possible. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and EMBASE were searched for relevant studies up to 18th June 2024. Studies were included if they assessed the impact of SMI (bipolar disorder, schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders, other psychoses) on risk of mortality from any infectious disease excluding COVID-19. Random-effects meta-analyses of the risk of death from 'infectious diseases', respiratory infections, sepsis, and 'other' infections in SMI were performed. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023422151). Findings: Twenty-nine articles were included in the review. All were observational cohort studies carried out in high income countries and 59% were judged to be of good quality. Narrative analysis indicated that having SMI was associated with increased risk of death from infectious disease (23/29 studies), with mixed results for sepsis. People with SMI were more than twice as likely to die from 'infectious diseases' than the general population (pooled relative risk (RR) = 2.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.33-3.16, N = 739,852) and more than three times more likely to die from respiratory infections (pooled RR = 3.27, 95% CI = 2.57-4.17, N = 1,353,905). Sources of heterogeneity across studies included SMI diagnosis, gender, type of control group, and infection type. Interpretation: People with SMI are at an increased risk of death from infection, particularly from respiratory infections like influenza and pneumonia and should be prioritised for preventative strategies including influenza and pneumococcal vaccines. More work is needed to fully understand why infection mortality risk is increased in SMI. Funding: MQ Mental Health Research Fellowship MQF22∖12.

Indexed as

Bipolar disorderInfectionMortalityPneumoniaSchizophreniaSevere mental illness

Identifiers

PMID39649134
PMCPMC11625019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.