ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024
Multi-methods process evaluation of the SToP (See, Treat, Prevent) trial: a cluster randomised, stepped wedge trial to support healthy skin.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Berrembi Jarragboo-Boorroo Wajawoorroo Men'Gawoom Gijam (Gija Healthy Skin Story): Two-Way Learning for Healthy Skin.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025Trial
- Person, Provider, Practice and Policy-P4: A framework for two-way learning and aboriginal community-led health promotion and evaluation.Dialogues in health · 2026Article
- Acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026Review
- Burden and Experiences of Head Lice Infestation Among Children in Western Australia.Journal of parasitology research · 2026Article
- 'Beyond core business': A qualitative review of activities supporting environmental health within remote Western Australian schools.Dialogues in health · 2025Article
- Longitudinal surveillance of group A streptococcal pharyngitis and impetigo in remote Western Australian school children informs acute rheumatic fever prevention.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Healthy skin is important for maintaining overall physical and cultural health and wellbeing. However, remote-living Australian Aboriginal children contend with disproportionally high rates of Methods: A trial evaluation framework was developed, with the aim to assess whether the SToP activities were implemented as intended, and to gain insights into the implementation and practice necessary to translate this project more broadly. The evaluation employed a multi-methods approach, drawing on both quantitative (metadata relating to type and frequency of project activities, survey results) and qualitative (interview and yarning) data. The evaluation aimed to assess the delivery of the program in terms of implementation, degree of impact, and context. Findings: Nine Kimberley communities participated in the SToP Trial between September 2018 and November 2022. During visits at the end of Steps 1 and 2 (October 2021 and October 2022, respectively), 152 people including 46 community members, 69 school staff members, 29 clinic staff members and 8 other service providers participated in a combination of individual and group interviews/yarns. Findings indicate the SToP Trial and associated activities existed and were completed within a culturally complex context with competing health and socioeconomic priorities while retaining specificity to each involved community. Acceptance and uptake of community activities was high, reflected in a marked decrease in skin infection during the Trial period. Trial activities including increased skin surveillance, staff training, availability of study treatment, environmental health initiatives and health promotion could not individually be linked to this improvement in skin health. Interpretation: The leadership and guidance of community leaders, families, and regional Kimberley partners contributed to the Trial succeeding in its intended delivery of activities. Similar projects should prioritise a co-designed community-wide, holistic approach to health issues. Funding: This trial was funded by the WA Department of Health, Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), and Healthway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.