ArticleEndocrine oncology (Bristol, England)2024
Time toxicity of lutetium 177 in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.
Article in Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Time toxicity in cancer care: a systematic review of definitions and measurement methods.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: We aim to investigate the time toxicity of patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours treated with Lutetium-177 Dotatate in a single institution. Design: This is a retrospective cohort study. Methods: All patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours treated with Lutetium-177 Dotatate at the Alexander Fleming Institute were included. Our primary endpoint was to evaluate time toxicity, which accounted for every day that the patient had contact with any department of any healthcare institution. Results: Our cohort included 21 patients with metastatic disease, female sex 86%, and a median age of 55 (IQR 44-63). The primary tumour site was the small intestine in 47.6% of the cases. The median number of previous systemic treatments for advanced disease was two (IQR 2-3). The overall response rate was 19%, and 66.6% had clinical benefit. The median calculated 'time toxicity' was 11 days (IQR 8-18), representing 5.7% of the total treatment duration. The main contributors to time toxicity included infusion days, blood draws, radiological scans, and hospitalisations (median of 4 days for each). Conclusion: Lutetium-177 Dotatate treatment for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours was associated with low time toxicity, excellent tolerability, a good response and prolonged PFS, of which the median was not reached in the short follow-up we present. Newer treatments with different mechanisms of action provide longer survival and widen the landscape of choices. Understanding new clinical endpoints is important for the transition into a more modern clinical practice, strengthening personalised and patient-oriented strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.