ArticlePerspectives on medical education2024
Identifying Behaviours Representative of Agentic Engagement in Pre-clinical Medical Education PBL Groups Based on Literature and Observations.
Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unlocking student voice in the first year: a change laboratory approach to curriculum co-design in undergraduate medical education.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In this study we aimed to identify behaviours representative of agentic engagement in pre-clinical medical education problem-based learning (PBL) groups. Agentic engagement is defined as the proactive, intentional contributions students make to their flow of instruction. This concept, developed in secondary education, appears relevant for benefitting optimally from PBL in higher medical education. Methods: We followed a four-step process to identify any behaviours representative of agentic engagement in our PBL setting. Following a literature search on agentic engagement scales, proactive behaviour, PBL practices and adult learning, we listed behaviours that could denote agentic engagement in our context. We fine-tuned this list through exploratory observations and tailored it to our specific context of second-year PBL groups. Results: We identified ten observable student behaviours representative of agentic engagement within medical PBL groups. Some aligned with previous literature (asking questions, telling the teacher what they (dis)like, telling the teacher what they are interested in, defending opinions, expressing expectations, suggesting co-operation), and others had not been identified before as representative of agentic engagement (making learning as interactive as possible, creating alternative ways of covering the material, correcting content and enriching others' insights); thereby introducing novel behaviours unique to our setting. Discussion: In medical PBL groups, we identified both known agentic engagement behaviours and distinctive behaviours specific to our context, thereby highlighting that the expression of agentic engagement is context-bound.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.