ArticleRevista brasileira de ortopedia2024
Chronic Compartment Syndrome in Athletes.
Article in Revista brasileira de ortopedia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic compartment syndrome (CCS) is a pressure increase within a non-expandable fibro-osseous space resulting from continuous and intense physical activity. Its symptoms usually improve with rest or reduced activity. It is a critical cause of lower limb pain in athletes and the second most common cause of effort-related leg pain. Less frequent reports include CCS in the lumbar paravertebral compartments, in the hand, the forearm, the thigh, and the foot. Although CCS mainly affects long-distance runners, it may also occur in sports such as lacrosse, football, basketball, skiing, and field hockey. Muscle tension, cramps, symptoms worsening with physical exercise, pain, and reduced sensitivity in the upper part of the foot are the main CCS findings, and diagnosis is essentially clinical. Even though controversial and with some limitations, CCS diagnosis has relied on measuring the intracompartmental pressure after exercise. However, new alternative tools are under study, particularly those less invasive, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after the exercise protocol. For years, open fasciotomy was the most relevant treatment for CCS in athletes, but new surgical techniques are gaining importance, such as minimally-invasive fasciotomy and endoscopic procedures. Some conservative therapies hold promise as potential alternatives for patients who do not want surgery, but robust evidence to support them remains lacking, especially for athletes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.