ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2025
How Much More Time Neurologic Examination Adds to Outpatient Visits: A Study of Cross-Sectional Data.
Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementation of a standardized Video-based Asynchronous Neurological Examination (VANE) in a multi-center observational study of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and AD related dementias.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Promoting Exercise as a Therapeutic Intervention in Multiple Sclerosis: Barriers, Efficacy, and Social Prescribing Strategies.Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The neurologic examination is a key part of neurologist visits. The neurologic examination leads to more accurate diagnoses, avoidance of unnecessary tests and procedures, and a stronger doctor-patient relationship. However, the neurologic examination takes time to perform, leading to longer visits with neurologists than with other specialists. We hypothesize that the neurologic examination adds quantifiable time to patient visits to a neurologist. Methods: We examined a 5-year cross-section of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 2012-2016, selecting visits to a neurologist. We extracted an indicator for neurologic examination, time spent with the patient in minutes, patient demographics, new or established visit, reasons for visit, new vs chronic problems, insurance status, geographic region, collection year, and survey design variables. We report descriptive statistics among patient visits with and without neurologic examinations and built a generalized linear model of visit time and neurologic examination with patient and visit information as covariates and interaction terms between neurologic examination and new/established visits. A subgroup analysis was conducted by reasons for visit. All analyses incorporated survey design variables for accurate standard errors. Results: There were 4,009 patient visits among 211 neurologists, comprising 11.3 million annual visits in the weighted sample. Neurologic examination was reported in 58%, with no difference in demographics, geographic regions, or reasons for visit between those who did or did not receive a neurologic examination. The mean time spent with the patient in visits with a neurologic examination was 29.9 minutes, compared with 25.0 minutes without ( Discussion: This study demonstrates the association of neurologic examinations with increased time spent with the patient in ambulatory care. Further work is needed to assess the effects on medical decision making, costs of care, and patient access to neurologists.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.