Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39649012›Full record

ReviewNew forests2025

A trans-Atlantic perspective on successful plantation establishment in boreal ecosystems: lessons learned and research opportunities.

Nelson Thiffault, Per Nordin, Amy Wotherspoon, Karin Hjelm, Erika Olofsson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in New forests, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nelson ThiffaultNatural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Québec, QC Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2017-6890
Per NordinpcSKOG AB, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2156-6615
Amy WotherspoonUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6480-2318
Karin HjelmSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, Alnarp, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6144-8250
Erika OlofssonDepartment of Forestry and Wood Technology, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5844-6775

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Boreal forests, which account for one-third of the world's forested areas, play a crucial role in global climate regulation and provide significant ecological, economic, and cultural benefits. However, boreal ecosystems face substantial threats from climate change, leading to increased disturbances such as wildfires, insect outbreaks, and disease. In response, reforestation emerges as a vital strategy for maintaining and restoring forest cover. In this perspective paper, we summarize some recent research on plantation establishment in boreal ecosystems of eastern North America and Scandinavia, emphasizing the effectiveness of mechanical site preparation (MSP), species-specific responses, and soil nutrient dynamics. We suggest key areas for future research, including the long-term sustainability of MSP, the development of adaptive strategies to climate variability, species-specific optimization of planting techniques, and integration of technological advances. Addressing these research needs will support the development of adaptive silviculture practices that enhance boreal stands resilience and productivity, helping to meet reforestation objectives and mitigate the impacts of climate change. We aim to stimulate regional, national, and international research initiatives, contributing to the resilience and sustainability of boreal ecosystems.

Indexed as

Boreal forestsClimate change adaptationMechanical Site Preparation (MSP)ReforestationRegenerationSilviculture

Identifiers

PMID39649012
PMCPMC11618171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.