SynthesisBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2025
Systematic review and meta-analysis of vancomycin therapeutic level for treatment of vancomycin-sensitive enterococcal infections.
Synthesis in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of vancomycin therapeutic level for treatment of vancomycin-sensitive enterococcal infections.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- PK/PD study of vancomycin in enterococcal infections: efficacy and safety assessment under the guidance of TDM.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Observational
- Optimizing Vancomycin Area under the Concentration-Time Curve Targets in Enterococcal Bacteremia: Balancing Efficacy and Nephrotoxicity.Yonsei medical journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsEvidence on the optimal targets of vancomycin for treating other Gram-positive infections apart from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is lacking. This review aims to identify the recommended vancomycin therapeutic level for favourable clinical outcomes among patients infected with vancomycin-sensitive enterococcal infections.
methodsAnalytical studies describing the vancomycin levels of vancomycin-sensitive enterococcal infections among adult population were searched. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcomes were clinical failure and nephrotoxicity. Study characteristics were extracted and pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. The study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool.
resultsA total of nine retrospective cohorts studies involving 1013 patients with vancomycin-sensitive enterococci were included. The meta-analysis found that high area under the curve to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio (AUC/MIC) of vancomycin ≥ 389 mg*h/L significantly lowered the 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26-0.75). Analysis of the target AUC/MIC showed that high vancomycin AUC/MIC (≥ 389-400 mg*h/L) significantly reduced clinical failure rate (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37-0.94). The mortality and treatment failure rates did not differ significantly between those with high or low trough levels. Higher vancomycin AUC/MIC and trough levels were significantly associated with increased nephrotoxicity (OR 3.11, 95% CI 1.65-5.89; OR 2.95, 95% CI 1.60-5.44, respectively).
conclusionsThe use of a higher vancomycin AUC/MIC concentration can be effective to reduce 30-day mortality and clinical failure but this needs to take into consideration the risk of nephrotoxicity. Well-conducted prospective studies are warranted due to the scarcity of evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.