Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39648680›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2025

Systematic review and meta-analysis of vancomycin therapeutic level for treatment of vancomycin-sensitive enterococcal infections.

Wasan Katip, Shaun Wen Huey Lee, Nongyao Kasatpibal, Ajaree Rayanakorn

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wasan KatipDepartment of Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Shaun Wen Huey LeeSchool of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7361-6576
Nongyao KasatpibalEpidemiological and Innovative Research Group for Infectious Diseases (EIRGID), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Ajaree RayanakornEpidemiological and Innovative Research Group for Infectious Diseases (EIRGID), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5961-8978

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsEvidence on the optimal targets of vancomycin for treating other Gram-positive infections apart from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is lacking. This review aims to identify the recommended vancomycin therapeutic level for favourable clinical outcomes among patients infected with vancomycin-sensitive enterococcal infections.

methodsAnalytical studies describing the vancomycin levels of vancomycin-sensitive enterococcal infections among adult population were searched. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcomes were clinical failure and nephrotoxicity. Study characteristics were extracted and pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. The study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool.

resultsA total of nine retrospective cohorts studies involving 1013 patients with vancomycin-sensitive enterococci were included. The meta-analysis found that high area under the curve to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio (AUC/MIC) of vancomycin ≥ 389 mg*h/L significantly lowered the 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26-0.75). Analysis of the target AUC/MIC showed that high vancomycin AUC/MIC (≥ 389-400 mg*h/L) significantly reduced clinical failure rate (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37-0.94). The mortality and treatment failure rates did not differ significantly between those with high or low trough levels. Higher vancomycin AUC/MIC and trough levels were significantly associated with increased nephrotoxicity (OR 3.11, 95% CI 1.65-5.89; OR 2.95, 95% CI 1.60-5.44, respectively).

conclusionsThe use of a higher vancomycin AUC/MIC concentration can be effective to reduce 30-day mortality and clinical failure but this needs to take into consideration the risk of nephrotoxicity. Well-conducted prospective studies are warranted due to the scarcity of evidence.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsEnterococcusGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsVancomycinArea Under CurveHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycinAUCenterococcipharmacokinetictherapeutic leveltroughvancomycin

Identifiers

PMID39648680
PMCPMC11999052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.