ArticleScience progress
Evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy of renal artery stenting in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis.
Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effect of Renal Artery Stent Implantation on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Early-Stage (Non-Atrophic Kidney) and Clinically Overt Severe Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis (ARAS-TR).Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- MRI-Based Radiomics to Predict Renal Function Response to Renal Artery Stenting for Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIt is currently controversial whether renal artery stenting is beneficial for the clinical outcomes of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) patients. The study aims to evaluate whether blood pressure (BP) and renal function improve in ARAS patients after stenting.
methodsA retrospective study was conducted on 78 ARAS patients who underwent renal artery stenting at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from January 2013 to June 2024. BP, the number of oral antihypertensive medications, renal function, and adverse events were analyzed before and after stenting.
resultsA total of 90 stents were implanted. The median follow-up time was 1.59 years. From 24 hours post-operation, significant decline in BP were observed. During follow-up, systolic BP decreased by 24.27 mmHg (95% CI: 16.54-32.00;
conclusionsRenal artery stenting might significantly reduce BP and improve renal function in ARAS patients, particularly those with mild renal impairment, which still requires prospective multicenter studies to confirm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.