ArticleJournal of biopharmaceutical statistics2026
Borrowing using historical-bias power prior with empirical Bayes.
Article in Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adaptively incorporating historical information into analyses of current data can improve the precision of inference without requiring additional new observation. Unfortunately, not all borrowing methods are suitable when limited historical studies are available. When a single historical study is available, the power priors control the amount of information to borrow via specification of a weight parameter that discounts the contribution of the historical data in a likelihood combined with current data. We develop a new type of conditional power prior called the historical-bias power prior using an empirical Bayes approach. It relaxes the assumption of the traditional power priors to allow for historical bias. Moreover, our new weight function controls the amount of borrowing and only borrows when historical data satisfy the borrowing criteria. This is achieved by embedding the Frequentist test-then-pool approach in the weight function. Hence, the historical-bias power prior builds a bridge between the Frequentist test-then-pool and the Bayesian power prior. In the simulation, we examine the impact of historical bias on the operating characteristics for borrowing approaches, which has not been discussed in previous literature. The results show that the historical-bias power prior yields accurate estimation and robustly powerful tests for the experimental treatment effect with good type I error control, especially when historical bias exists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.