ArticleJournal of morphology2024
Comparative Morphology of the Extrinsic and Intrinsic Leg Musculature in Dictyoptera (Insecta: Blattodea, Mantodea).
Article in Journal of morphology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A striking difference: biomechanics of the impaling hunting strategy of a moss mantis.Frontiers in zoology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Insect legs, as primarily locomotory devices, can show a tremendous variety of morphological modifications providing a multitude of usages. The prehensile raptorial forelegs of praying mantises (Mantodea) are a prominent example of true multifunctionality since they are used for walking while being efficient prey-capturing and grasping devices. Although being mostly generalist arthropod predators, various morphological adaptations due to different environmental conditions occur across Mantodea. Recently, the general mantodean morphology, and particularly their raptorial forelegs, received an increased interest. Yet, knowledge about the evolutionary transition from walking to prey-grasping legs is still scarce. From evolutionary and functional perspectives, the question arises: what changes were necessary to achieve the strongly modified raptorial forelegs-while keeping walking ability-and how does the foreleg morphology differ from the remaining four walking legs? In this context, we investigated the musculature of the raptorial forelegs in seven phylogenetically distant mantodeans, including pterothoracic legs in four of them, using high-resolution microcomputed tomography and dissection. To understand the results from an evolutionary perspective, we additionally examined all three pairs of unmodified walking legs of the closest sister group-Blattodea. We updated the knowledge of blattodean morphology, revealing differences in cuticle structures of the coxal articulation of the first pair of legs between the two orders and a shared musculature set-up in all pairs of legs among later-branching mantodeans. Interestingly, the early branching species Metallyticus splendidus and Chaeteessa sp. show several muscular characteristics, otherwise found exclusively in one or the other order, with a few procoxal muscles showing an intermediate state between the two orders. Studying the evolutionary transition from a walking leg to a raptorial leg will help to understand the character evolution of this highly specialized biomechanical system from a purely locomotory appendage to a multi-functional device with all related amenities and constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.