Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39648354›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)2025

Habitual caffeine intake, genetics and cognitive performance.

Angeliki Kapellou, Leta Pilic, Yiannis Mavrommatis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Acute Effects of Guarana (Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Angeliki KapellouFaculty of Sport, Allied Health and Performance Science, St Mary's University Twickenham, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4545-2257
Leta PilicFaculty of Sport, Allied Health and Performance Science, St Mary's University Twickenham, London, UK.
Yiannis MavrommatisFaculty of Sport, Allied Health and Performance Science, St Mary's University Twickenham, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch on caffeine and cognitive performance remains controversial. Variations in genes associated with caffeine metabolism and response such as

aimTo investigate caffeine × gene interactions on cognitive performance in all key domains of cognition in healthy individuals.

methodsParticipants completed a lifestyle and food frequency questionnaire and a cognitive test battery including validated tasks to assess the domains of social cognition, memory, attention and executive function. Genotyping was performed for

resultsSignificant gene × caffeine interactions were observed for the domains of social cognition, (

conclusionsThe present findings suggest an association between genetic caffeine metabolism, habitual caffeine intake and cognitive function in the domains of social cognition and executive function. More research in naturalistic environments using larger cohorts is needed to confirm these findings to add to our understanding of how habitual caffeine may influence cognitive function based on individual genotype.

Indexed as

CaffeineCognitionAdultApolipoproteins EAttentionBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsCytochrome P-450 CYP1A2Executive FunctionFemaleGenotypeHumansMaleMemoryNeuropsychological TestsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReceptor, Adenosine A2AADORA2A protein, humanAHR protein, humanApolipoproteins EBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsCaffeineCYP1A2 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP1A2Receptor, Adenosine A2AReceptors, Aryl HydrocarbonAttentioncoffeecognitionmemorypolymorphism

Identifiers

PMID39648354
PMCPMC11843791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.