ArticleTransfusion2025
"Are my blood products coming?": Implementation of a novel blood product tracker in the electronic health record system.
Article in Transfusion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Just-in-time display of minor red blood cell antibodies.Transfusion · 2025Article
- "Are my blood products coming?": Implementation of a novel blood product tracker in the electronic health record system.Transfusion · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBlood transfusions are the most common procedure performed in American hospitals. The steps required for blood product delivery are often misunderstood by providers, leading to numerous phone calls to the blood bank requesting order status. Distracting calls can lengthen turnaround time, especially during blood product or staff shortages. We sought a tool to address these questions and reduce distraction. This study highlights a novel blood tracker tool implemented in the electronic health record (EHR) that allows providers to see their blood order's status. STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsWith a multidisciplinary team of healthcare professionals, we constructed a user-friendly blood tracker highly visible in our EHR. It shows the status of a blood product in real time from "order printed" to "preparing" to "on its way." We surveyed blood bank technologists to determine if call volume and distraction changed.
resultsWe counted the number of views per month as a surrogate of usage. The blood tracker was viewed 109,626 times per month on average from January through December 2023. The fraction of technologists who received 21 or more calls per shift decreased by 47%. DISCUSSION: We successfully constructed and implemented a novel blood tracker into our EHR that relays the status of a blood product. It is a highly viewed piece of information in our EHR and decreases blood bank call volume as reported by blood bank technologists. Its success demonstrates that closed-loop communication between the lab and providers regarding blood products is beneficial within our organization and potentially others.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.