ArticleSpinal cord series and cases2024
Spontaneous spinal epidural hematomas-Time is running out!
Article in Spinal cord series and cases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Emergency surgical intervention for bulbar-cervical spinal cord hemorrhage: a case report and review of management strategies.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSpontaneous spinal epidural hematoma (SSEH) is the rarest cause of spinal cord compression, causing paraparesis or quadriparesis. They account for less than 1% (0.1 patients per 100,000 patients per year) of all spinal canal space-occupying lesions, thus resulting in a paucity of literature. Here, we report three cases of SSEH; all had a neurological deficit on presentation and were surgically managed with decompressive laminectomy and evacuation of the hematoma. CASE PRESENTATION: Of the three patients, one had a history of coronary artery disease and was on anticoagulants. In the remaining two, no cause could be identified. The hematoma was located at the thoracic region in 2 patients and at the cervical in one. Hematoma were located dorsal to cord in 2 patients and ventral in one. Two cases presented within 30 h of the onset of symptoms with the ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) impairment scale (AIS) A and B neurology. Both showed a complete recovery during their latest follow-up. However, one case presented after 2 days with AIS A neurology and improved to AIS B post-operatively at 30 months follow-up. DISCUSSION: The myriad of symptoms and the need for an MRI for diagnosis have made SSEH difficult to diagnose clinically. Unlike other spinal pathologies where the severity of the preoperative neurological deficit is the best predictor of prognosis, in SSEH, time is the best predictor of prognosis. Our series highlights the fact that irrespective of the severity of the preoperative neurological deficit, timely diagnosis and early, adequate decompression surgery are essential for complete neurological recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.