Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39648216›Full record

ArticlePediatric surgery international2024

Hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: the impact of high enema pressure on success rates.

Bingjie Wang, Ziwei Jian, Weicheng Huang, Beilei Huang, Fengguang Ye, Jinrong Chen, Wenyou Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bingjie WangDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, No .59 North Shengli Rd, Zhangzhou, 363000, Fujian, China.
Ziwei JianDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, No .59 North Shengli Rd, Zhangzhou, 363000, Fujian, China.
Weicheng HuangDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, No .59 North Shengli Rd, Zhangzhou, 363000, Fujian, China.
Beilei HuangDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian, China.
Fengguang YeDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, No .59 North Shengli Rd, Zhangzhou, 363000, Fujian, China.
Jinrong ChenDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, No .59 North Shengli Rd, Zhangzhou, 363000, Fujian, China.
Wenyou ChenDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, No .59 North Shengli Rd, Zhangzhou, 363000, Fujian, China. chenwy0596@163.com.

Funding

Startup Fund for scientific research, Fujian Medical University 2021QH1263
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study is to analyze the effect of increasing enema pressure on enema outcomes.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective study to compare the effect of increasing enema pressure on enema outcomes. The primary outcome was the success rate of reduction, while secondary outcomes included intestinal perforation and recurrence rate.

resultsFrom May 2017 to April 2021, a total of 531 intussusceptions in 499 patients (Group A 247 patients, Group B 252 patients) were collected. The overall success reduction rate was 97.00%. The success reduction rate in Group A was 99.20% (245/247) and 94.8% (239/252) in Group B (P = 0.004). The overall recurrence rate within 48 h after the initial enema reduction was 8.02%, and beyond 48 h was 6.41%. The recurrence rates within 48 h and beyond 48 h were 9.39% and 6.53% in group A and 7.11% and 6.69% in group B, respectively (P = 0.526). No complications were associated with the enema reduction procedure.

conclusionOur study has shown that using a hydrostatic pressure of 130 mmHg for enema reduction is both effective and safe, with a higher success rate and no increased risk of complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, III.

Indexed as

EnemaIntussusceptionFemaleHumansHydrostatic PressureIntestinal PerforationMaleRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeHydrostatic Reduction PressureIntussusceptionReduction RateUltrasound-Guided

Identifiers

PMID39648216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.