Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39647785›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology2025

Left ventricular hypertrophy and ventricular ectopy in mitral valve prolapse.

Andrew P Cesmat, Abdul M Chaudry, Suhani Gupta, Thelsa T Weickert, Ross J Simpson, Faisal F Syed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrew P CesmatUniversity of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Abdul M ChaudryDepartment of Medicine, Southeast Alabama Medical Center, Dothan, AL, United States of America.
Suhani GuptaDivision of Cardiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Thelsa T WeickertUniversity of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America; Division of Cardiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Ross J SimpsonUniversity of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America; Division of Cardiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Faisal F SyedUniversity of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America; Division of Cardiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America. Electronic address: faisal_syed@med.unc.edu.

Funding

North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS)UM1TR004406 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI NICHOLAS J SHAHEEN · 2023 to 2026
$37.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSudden deaths ascribed to mitral valve prolapse (MVP) have increased ventricular mass on autopsy. It is unknown if left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a risk factor for ventricular arrhythmia in MVP.

methodsWe studied all 629 patients aged 18-90 years with MVP on echocardiography between 2016 and 19 at our institution. Echocardiograms were reviewed for LVH, ventricular size and function, and valvular pathology. Complex or frequent ventricular ectopy (cfVE) was defined as ≥ 2 premature ventricular complexes (PVC) on a 10-s ECG or > 1 % PVC burden or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia on ambulatory ECG. Multivariable logistic regression and cox proportional hazards regression were used to assess the relationships between LVH, mitral valve structural features, and cfVE in MVP.

resultsLVH was present in 141 (22.4 %) patients. Of those with LVH, 44 (31.2 %) had cfVE compared to 87 (17.8 %) without LVH (p = 0.001). Independent predictors of cfVE were mitral annular disjunction (OR [95 % CI] 2.34 [1.54-3.56]), bileaflet prolapse (1.78 [1.19-2.66]), heart failure (1.79 [1.15-2.79]), lower ejection fraction (0.18 [0.04-0.83]), coronary artery disease (1.58 [1.04-2.39]), and T-wave inversion (1.51 [1.03-2.22]). However, LVH was not independently associated with cfVE (1.22 [0.82-1.83], p = 0.32).

conclusionLeft ventricular hypertrophy is not an independent risk factor for ventricular arrhythmia in MVP. Ventricular arrhythmogenesis in MVP is predominantly determined by mitral morphological factors and heart failure. Further work is required to better understand the predisposition to sudden death of patients with MVP and increased ventricular mass.

Indexed as

Hypertrophy, Left VentricularMitral Valve ProlapseVentricular Premature ComplexesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEchocardiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsYoung AdultArrhythmic mitral valve prolapseLeft ventricular hypertrophyMitral valve prolapseRisk stratificationVentricular arrhythmia

Identifiers

PMID39647785
PMCPMC11725436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.