Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39647479›Full record

ArticleJournal of sleep research2025

Trends and variation in issuance of high-cost narcolepsy drugs by NHS England organisations and regions from 2019 to 2022.

Frederick van Someren, Milan Wiedemann, Charlotte Warren-Gash, Martina Sykorova, Hema Mistry, Michelle A Miller, Guy Leschziner, Ellen Nolte, Aurélien Belot, Ian E Smith and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sleep research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Frederick van SomerenNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3885-5648
Milan WiedemannThe Bennett Institute for Applied Data Science, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Charlotte Warren-GashFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Martina SykorovaFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2579-5888
Hema MistryWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.
Michelle A MillerWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.
Guy LeschzinerDepartment of Neurology and Sleep Disorders Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Ellen NolteFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Aurélien BelotFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Ian E SmithRespiratory Support and Sleep Centre, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Tim QuinnellRespiratory Support and Sleep Centre, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Sofia H ErikssonNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
Helen StrongmanFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8739-4601

Funding

Cancer Research UK EPNCZS34National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR301730University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research CentreWellcome Career Development Award 225868/Z/22/ZWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinicians and people with narcolepsy report varied access to higher-cost narcolepsy treatments in England associated with variations in national and local commissioning. There are no publicly available data quantifying use of these drugs to support policy decisions. We therefore aimed to describe national, regional and local prescribing trends for higher-cost narcolepsy drugs using new national databases. We used the English prescribing dataset and secondary care medicines data to quantify volumes of high-cost narcolepsy drugs issued between 01 January 2019 and 31 December 2022. Volumes were converted to World Health Organisation defined daily doses, to estimate the monthly number of defined daily doses of sodium oxybate, pitolisant and solriamfetol issued by each integrated care board and region. We compared national, integrated care board, and regional level issuance of each drug over time. Analysis of almost 6000 primary care prescriptions and 2000 cumulative months of secondary care pharmacy stock data, issued across 41/42 integrated care boards in England, revealed a 49.1% increase in issuance of high-cost narcolepsy drugs between 2019 and 2022. In 2022, sodium oxybate accounted for 52.66% of issuance, pitolisant 43.09% and solriamfetol 4.25%, with 22.31% of defined daily doses issued in primary care. Three integrated care boards (NHS Southeast London, NHS Cumbria and North-East, NHS Cheshire and Merseyside) predominate, issuing 56.33% of all defined daily doses. Variations between integrated care boards and regions differ substantially by drug and route of issuance. Our findings describe substantial variation in the use of specialist narcolepsy drugs in England, and highlight the untapped potential of using large, public domain datasets to publicly review higher-cost drug prescribing.

Indexed as

Drug CostsDrug PrescriptionsNarcolepsyPractice Patterns, Physicians'State MedicineEnglandHumansSodium OxybateSodium Oxybatenarcolepsypharmacoepidemiologypitolisantsodium oxybatesolriamfetol

Identifiers

PMID39647479
PMCPMC12215291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.