Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39645459›Full record

ArticleAcademic radiology2025

Automated Classification of Body MRI Sequences Using Convolutional Neural Networks.

Boah Kim, Tejas Sudharshan Mathai, Kimberly Helm, Pritam Mukherjee, Jianfei Liu, Ronald M Summers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Classification of Multi-Parametric Body MRI Series Using Deep Learning.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Boah KimNational Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Building 10 Room 1C224, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1182, USA.
Tejas Sudharshan MathaiNational Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Building 10 Room 1C224, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1182, USA. Electronic address: tejas.mathai@nih.gov.
Kimberly HelmNational Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Building 10 Room 1C224, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1182, USA.
Pritam MukherjeeNational Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Building 10 Room 1C224, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1182, USA.
Jianfei LiuNational Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Building 10 Room 1C224, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1182, USA.
Ronald M SummersNational Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Building 10 Room 1C224, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1182, USA.

Funding

Computer Aided Detection for Radiologic ImagesZ01CL040004 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI SUMMERS, RONALD M. · 2003 to 2008
$41k
Computer Aided Detection for Radiologic ImagesZIACL040004 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI SUMMERS, RONALD M. · 2009 to 2025
$0k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 CL040004Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CL999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE AND

objectivesMulti-parametric MRI (mpMRI) studies of the body are routinely acquired in clinical practice. However, a standardized naming convention for MRI protocols and series does not exist currently. Conflicts in the series descriptions present in the DICOM headers arise due to myriad MRI scanners from various manufacturers used for imaging, wide variations in imaging practices across institutions, and technologist preferences. These conflicts affect the hanging protocol, which dictates the arrangement of sequences for the reading radiologist. At present, clinician supervision is necessary to ensure that the correct sequence is being read and used for diagnosis. This pilot work seeks to classify five different series in mpMRI studies acquired at the levels of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. MATERIALS AND

methodsFirst, 2D and 3D classification networks were compared using data acquired by Siemens scanners and the optimal network was identified. Then, its performance was analyzed when trained with different training data quantities. The out-of-distribution (OOD) robustness on data acquired by a Philips scanner was also measured. In addition, the effect of data augmentation on model training was studied. The model was also tested with smaller input volumes through downsampling or cropping. Finally, the model was trained on combined data from both Siemens and Philips scanners to bridge the performance gap between different scanners.

resultsAmong 2D and 3D networks of ResNet-50, ResNet-101, DenseNet- 121, and EfficientNet-BN0, the 3D DenseNet-121 ensemble achieved an F

conclusionOur pilot work is useful for the classification of MRI sequences in studies acquired at the level of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. It has the potential for robust automation of hanging protocols and the creation of large-scale data cohorts for pre-clinical research.

Indexed as

Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerAbdomenConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansPelvisPilot ProjectsThoraxBodyClassificationMRIMulti-parametricSequence

Identifiers

PMID39645459
PMCPMC11875920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.