Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39645264›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Psychological and pharmacological treatments of intermittent explosive disorder: a meta-analysis protocol.

Fangqing Liu, Xiaoshan Yin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fangqing LiuClinical Psychology, The University of Edinburgh School of Health in Social Science, Edinburgh, UK s2253725@ed.ac.uk.ORCID 0009-0008-7913-8964
Xiaoshan YinClinical Psychology, The University of Edinburgh School of Health in Social Science, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntermittent explosive disorder (IED) is characterised by recurrent, sudden episodes of impulsive aggression that are disproportionate to the provocation. The condition's management remains challenging due to the variability in treatment efficacy and the absence of Food and Drug Administration-approved interventions specifically for IED. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of existing treatments for IED. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted in November 2023, yielding 17 randomised controlled trials after screening and eligibility assessments. Studies were included based on participants' confirmed diagnosis of IED, sufficient statistical power and provision of data for effect size calculation. Interventions analysed included pharmacological treatments, psychotherapies and combination therapies, with an emphasis on cognitive-behavioural therapy and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Given that our study is a synthesis of published data, ethical approval from a research ethics committee is not required. Nevertheless, the methodology of this review was designed to ensure full transparency and accountability. All efforts have been made to respect the confidentiality and intellectual property rights of the original data sources. Any ethical issues encountered during the data collection process were addressed in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. As this research involves the analysis of existing published data, there are no direct safety concerns related to patient interactions. Our primary focus has been on ensuring the secure handling and processing of data to uphold the ethical standards set by previous original studies. To ensure the findings of our meta-analysis reach both the academic community and the public effectively, we aim to submit our findings to peer-reviewed journals within the fields of psychology to ensure rigorous review and broad academic dissemination. PROSPEO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024497587.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyDisruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct DisordersSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicPsychotherapyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsImpulse control disordersPsychosocial InterventionRandomized Controlled Trial

Identifiers

PMID39645264
PMCPMC11407219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.