Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39645250›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Young people's sense of agency and responsibility towards promoting mental health in Brazil: a reflexive thematic analysis.

Josimar Antônio de Alcântara Mendes, Sheila Giardini Murta, Felipe Rodrigues Siston, Rafaela de Oliveira da Cunha, Brenda Thallys Rocha Seabra, Julyana Alves Ferreira, Rafa Ribeiro Alves de Souza, Victor Hugo de Lima Santos, Ilina Singh, Gabriela Pavarini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. 'Co-Production Is Caring': Young People's Reflections on Responsible and Dialogic Co-Production in Youth Mental Health.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Josimar Antônio de Alcântara MendesInstitute of Psychology, University of Brasilia, Brasília, Brazil.
Sheila Giardini MurtaInstitute of Psychology, University of Brasilia, Brasília, Brazil.
Felipe Rodrigues SistonInstitute of Psychology, University of Brasilia, Brasília, Brazil.
Rafaela de Oliveira da CunhaEngajadamente Youth Collaborative Group, Brasília, UK.
Brenda Thallys Rocha SeabraEngajadamente Youth Collaborative Group, Brasília, UK.
Julyana Alves FerreiraEngajadamente Youth Collaborative Group, Brasília, UK.
Rafa Ribeiro Alves de SouzaEngajadamente Youth Collaborative Group, Brasília, UK.
Victor Hugo de Lima SantosEngajadamente Youth Collaborative Group, Brasília, UK.
Ilina SinghDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Gabriela PavariniDepartment of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK gabriela.pavarini@ethox.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5574-4021

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study investigated how Brazilian young people perceive their role in promoting and supporting their peer community's mental health and well-being, and the conditions and contexts influencing their engagement.

designCo-produced qualitative study using in-depth interviews and focus groups with adolescents. The sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed and anonymised. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

settingData collection took place remotely across Brazil via audio or video calls conducted by a youth collaborator and a senior researcher.

participants46 Brazilian adolescents aged between 15 and 18 years old, recruited primarily via social media.

resultsOur analysis generated four overarching themes: (1) young people's sense of responsibility and motivation-many participants felt committed to promoting the mental health and well-being of their friends and community, while also critically emphasising responsibilities of and partnerships with adult stakeholders to make a meaningful difference; (2) strategies for promoting peer mental health-suggested strategies included peer-to-peer support, such as non-judgemental listening, and collective actions such as forming school groups; (3) intrapersonal barriers-key barriers to participation included a lack of necessary skills and self-efficacy; and (4) contextual barriers-young people reported feeling unheard, invalidated, and fearing judgement due to mental health stigma.

conclusionThese findings support an ecological view of youth participation in the promotion of mental health as dependent on intrapersonal, interpersonal and contextual factors. Realising young people's potential in advancing mental health in their communities requires fostering youth-adult partnerships, providing peer support training, and combating adultism and mental health stigma.

Indexed as

Focus GroupsMental HealthPeer GroupQualitative ResearchAdolescentBrazilFemaleHealth PromotionHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMotivationSocial ResponsibilitySocial SupportChild & adolescent psychiatryCommunity child healthMENTAL HEALTHPatient ParticipationPsychosocial InterventionSocial Support

Identifiers

PMID39645250
PMCPMC11628997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.