Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39644444›Full record

ArticleDrugs - real world outcomes2025

Determinants of the Financial Impact of Orphan Drugs in Italy: Differences Between Expected and Observed Pharmaceutical Expenditure.

Francesco Saverio Mennini, Americo Cicchetti, Paolo Sciattella, Filippo Rumi, Matteo Zanuzzi, Angelica Carletto, Annalisa Sammarco, Federica Romano, Pierluigi Russo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs - real world outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Francesco Saverio MenniniDepartments of Healthcare Planning, Medical Devices, Pharmaceuticals, and Policies in Support of the National Health Service, Italian Ministry of Health, Rome, Italy.
Americo CicchettiFaculty of Economics, Economic Evaluation and HTA, CEIS, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Paolo SciattellaDepartment of Healthcare Planning, Italian Ministry of Health, Rome, Italy. paolo.sciattella@uniroma2.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8364-1895
Filippo RumiGraduate School of Health Economics and Management (ALTEMS), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Matteo ZanuzziItalian Medicines Agency, Rome, Italy.
Angelica CarlettoItalian Medicines Agency, Rome, Italy.
Annalisa SammarcoItalian Medicines Agency, Rome, Italy.
Federica RomanoItalian Medicines Agency, Rome, Italy.
Pierluigi RussoItalian Medicines Agency, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increasing demand for orphan drugs and the financial challenges associated with their reimbursement highlights the need to understand the dynamics between expected and actual pharmaceutical expenditures, particularly in the context of pricing and reimbursement negotiations.

objectiveThe study aims to identify the potential determinants of the difference in expected pharmaceutical spending after negotiation and the actual expenditure incurred (ΔS), as well as the difference in expected pharmaceutical spending before and after the price and reimbursement negotiation process (ΔSn) for rare disease drugs in Italy.

methodsThe analysis focused on orphan drugs authorised by European Medicines Agency, with reimbursement applications to the Italian Medicines Agency from January 2013 to January 2019. Expected post-negotiation spending was estimated by applying negotiated discounts and financial-based market entry agreements to the expected pharmaceutical expenditure. The actual expenditure was approximated through company turnovers. Beta regression models were applied to identify potential determinants of ΔS and ΔSn.

resultsThe study analysed 52 reimbursed orphan drugs, with 41 (78.8%) with a single indication, 25 (48.1%) antineoplastics and immunomodulators and 18 (34.6%) conditionally/fully innovative. The median expenditure in the first 3 years post-commercialisation was 7.6% lower than expected post-negotiation. The reduction was less pronounced for innovative drugs (p = 0.011), drugs with a prices and reimbursement procedure in the subsequent 3 years (p = 0.007) and those with multiple indications (p = 0.021). Payment-by-result was the only significant variable associated with the expected spending ratio before and after negotiation (p = 0.002).

conclusionThe actual expenditure for orphan drugs aligns with the expected post-negotiation. Yet, innovative orphan drugs exhibit a higher actual expenditure than estimated, suggesting the market values their added therapeutic value or the actual therapeutic need they meet, and configuring innovativeness status as the main determinant of the orphan drugs financial impact in the multiple regression analysis.

Identifiers

PMID39644444
PMCPMC11829855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.