Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39644428›Full record

ArticleAmbio2025

Border militarization affects people's interactions with nature in Białowieża Forest.

Katarzyna Nowak, Agnieszka Olszańska, Agata Pietrzyk-Kaszyńska, Marek Giergiczny, Krzysztof Niedziałkowski, Katarzyna Simonienko, Bogdan Jaroszewicz

Abstract readNews
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katarzyna NowakBiałowieża Geobotanical Station, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, 17-230, Białowieża, Poland. k.nowak39@uw.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4992-7910
Agnieszka OlszańskaInstitute of Nature Conservation Polish Academy of Sciences, 31-120, Kraków, Poland.
Agata Pietrzyk-KaszyńskaInstitute of Nature Conservation Polish Academy of Sciences, 31-120, Kraków, Poland.
Marek GiergicznyDepartment of Microeconomics, Warsaw Centre of Ecological Economics, University of Warsaw, 00-241, Warsaw, Poland.
Krzysztof NiedziałkowskiInstitute of Philosophy and Sociology Polish Academy of Sciences, 00-330, Warsaw, Poland.
Katarzyna SimonienkoForest Therapy Center, 15-306, Białystok, Poland.
Bogdan JaroszewiczBiałowieża Geobotanical Station, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, 17-230, Białowieża, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Border militarization can impede people's interactions with nature in borderlands. We surveyed one border community to understand how local use of Białowieża Forest, one of Europe's last primary forest complexes, is affected by militarization. Out of 100 returned surveys, most respondents had a negative view of enforced border security measures (closure of the border zone, construction of a border barrier, military activities). Many felt they were not adequately consulted about these policies. Respondents felt discouraged from visiting Białowieża Forest mainly due to the presence of uniformed services and worsened conditions of forest roads caused by heavy machinery and traffic. Newcomers reported negative impacts on their health and well-being, while people born in the region (locals) had mixed reactions. Although locals were more equivocal in opposing the border barrier than newcomers, both groups perceived the environmental costs of its construction as high and reported a sense of separation from neighboring Belarus.

Indexed as

ForestsConservation of Natural ResourcesHumansPolandBorder wallHuman–nature connectionIndividual valuesLocal communityOld growth forestTransboundary ecosystem

Identifiers

PMID39644428
PMCPMC11662094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.