ArticleTropical animal health and production2024
Gene expression profiling of indigenous Tharparkar and crossbred Vrindavani cattle affected with lameness using PBMC model.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lameness is an economically significant, production-limiting syndrome that adversely affects the (re)production performance of animals besides deteriorating the quantity and quality aspects of milk in dairy cattle. The present study aimed to explore the potential biomarkers for painful foot lesions in indigenous Tharparkar and crossbred Vrindavani cattle affected with lameness. The differentially expressed genes in lame versus healthy animals were elucidated using microarray analysis and validated them by qRT-PCR. On microarray analysis, 504 genes were differentially expressed in lame crossbred cattle as compared to healthy counterparts. Similarly, 991 genes were differentially expressed in lame crossbred cattle as compared to the healthy Tharparkar animals. Various genes such as BOLA-DQA3, BOLA-DQA1, CCL4, CCR1, CCRL2, CXCL2, CXCL3, CXCL8, IL1A, IL1B, MMP-9 and SLC11A1 were common between both the comparisons (crossbred lame vs. crossbred normal cattle; and crossbred lame vs. normal Tharparkar cattle). The results revealed downregulation of multiple pro-inflammatory cytokines. Validation using qRT-PCR showed high correlation with the microarray results, except for the IRAK1 gene. The functional annotation and gene network analysis revealed involvement of various processes including inflammation, immunology, apoptosis, cell proliferation and cytoskeleton organization. The Ingenuity pathway analysis revealed three inhibited pathways in the comparison between lame and normal (healthy) crossbred cattle i.e., HMGB1-signalling pathway, Aryl hydrocarbon receptor signalling pathway, and Mitotic roles of pol-like kinase. Whereas, on comparison of lame crossbred with healthy Tharparkar cattle, the Situin signalling pathway was inhibited; the LxR/RxR activation pathway was activated. The results from microarray analysis, identifying differential expressed genes provides valuable insights into the development of molecular biomarkers for early detection of lameness-affected animals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39644418What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.