ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2025
Proteomics for forensic identification of saliva and vomit in a case of alleged rape.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrative Proteomic and Transcriptomic Profiling Identifies Candidate Biomarkers for Discriminating Anaphylactic from Cardiac Sudden Death.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In crime investigations, the unambiguous identification of biological traces can be decisive for framing the events. In this study, we applied proteomics to analyze scant amounts of biological residues in the context of an alleged rape case, focusing on the detection of traces of vomit. We used high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) and two distinct proteomic workflows to identify proteins and possible proteolytic peptides in biological residues from clothing, bedding, and car upholstery from the alleged crime scene. Specifically, a fragment of pillowcase contained a protein pattern indicative of human saliva and a complex panel of peptides resulting from extensive hydrolysis of salivary proteins. The presence of partly digested proteins from bovine meat, wheat, and eggs, along with salivary and gastric enzymes, demonstrated the presence of vomit on the alleged victim's trousers, also providing insights into the recently consumed meal. A drop of cow's milk on the seat of the suspect's car was likely irrelevant to the criminal act. Other fabric samples showed only common contaminants, excluding significant biological traces or food-derived proteins. These findings support the judicial decision regarding consent to sexual intercourse, for which DNA individualization lacks evidentiary power, and establish a reference for annotating saliva and vomit traces in forensic investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39644380What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.