ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2025
The role of large language models in self-care: a study and benchmark on medicines and supplement guidance accuracy.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a hybrid artificial intelligence framework for pharmacotherapy optimization.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- AI-generated patient information leaflets for oral anticoagulants: quality, usability, readability, and reproducibility compared with FDA-referenced materials.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Performance evaluation of large language models in real-world perinatal medication consultations: a cross-sectional study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Understanding Public Awareness, Attitudes, Beliefs, and Perceptions About ChatGPT in Saudi Arabia: A Road Map for Digital Health.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Article
- Evaluating open-source LLMs for dental EMR generation.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Closing the loop: human-augmented, mechanistically enhanced AI for proactive management of drug-drug interactions.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Application and Prospects of Large Language Models in Small-Molecule Drug Discovery.Analytical chemistry · 2025Review
- Guidelines for reporting artificial intelligence studies in medicines, pharmacotherapy, and pharmaceutical services: MedinAI development, validation and statement.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Article
- Application of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content in Medical Examinations.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe recent surge in the capabilities of artificial intelligence systems, particularly large language models, is also impacting the medical and pharmaceutical field in a major way. Beyond specialized uses in diagnostics and data discovery, these tools have now become accessible to the general public.
aimThe study aimed to critically analyse the current performance of large language models in answering patient's self-care questions regarding medications and supplements.
methodAnswers from six major language models were analysed for correctness, language-independence, context-sensitivity, and reproducibility using a newly developed reference set of questions and a scoring matrix.
resultsThe investigated large language models are capable of answering a clear majority of self-care questions accurately, providing relevant health information. However, substantial variability in the responses, including potentially unsafe advice, was observed, influenced by language, question structure, user context and time. GPT 4.0 scored highest on average, while GPT 3.5, Gemini, and Gemini Advanced had varied scores. Responses were context and language sensitive. In terms of consistency over time, Perplexity had the worst performance.
conclusionGiven the high-quality output of large language models, their potential in self-care applications is undeniable. The newly created benchmark can facilitate further validation and guide the establishment of strict safeguards to combat the sizable risk of misinformation in order to reach a more favourable risk/benefit ratio when this cutting-edge technology is used by patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.